Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It would be nice if the guy could get his facts straight.

The infrastructure (hardware and bandwidth) is cheap (almost free) for Q&A. Stackoverflow.com hasn’t even gone to two Web server yet.

Let's count them, shall we? http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/01/stack-overflow-network...

6 web servers and 2 database servers (the load balancers are virtual machined)

And about the money, there are labor costs.

Fog Creek has ~24 employees.

34 - http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2010/02/14.html




It's worth pointing out that those servers are for the entire set of sites of which only SO is anywhere remotely close to capacity but yes there are three Web servers for SO.

And yes the hardware/bandwidth costs are (still) nothing. Read:

http://highscalability.com/blog/2009/8/5/stack-overflow-arch...

(slightly outdated)

and you'll see how cheap the servers are: single CPU, relatively low RAM.

The 24 was a typo (now fixed). I updated the other too. Thanks for pointing that out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: