Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What's the real issue is:

<navbar></navbar>

Do you even know that this is invalid and the proper tag is called just <nav>? Do you know that <title> must not be empty in the initial page? Do you know that custom attributes must start with data- (not ng- or ui-)?

Did you even check your page with http://validator.w3.org?




Care to explain why this was downvoted?

I honestly don't understand how did the authors manage to make a skeleton (!) page not passing validation. Even <title> is empty when it must not be so.

Is it because of Angular? Well, if a framework forces you to write invalid HTML (tags, attributes, whatever), it sucks, no matter what.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: