Must be implying that Stanford is no longer around in 20002. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		tjr on Feb 7, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Knuth 3:16 (2002) Must be implying that Stanford is no longer around in 20002.

shoover on Feb 7, 2016 [–]

Heh, ok, I missed the 20002. I dunno, if any institution hangs around that long (including some form of www hosting for the OP), maybe Stanford has a chance, if not a copy of wikipedia or Knuth's books.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact