Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/why-do-patent-trolls-g...

> But why do patent plaintiffs, especially trolls, see it as such a favorable forum? Partly, the district's relatively rapid litigation timetable can put pressure on defendants to settle. But other local practices in the Eastern District also favor patentees. And, in our view, they do so in a way that is inconsistent with the governing Federal Rules, and work to mask the consistent refusal by the courts in the Eastern District to end meritless cases before trial.




> work to mask the consistent refusal by the courts in the Eastern District to end meritless cases before trial.

More trials should mean more money for lawyers in the area, judges, ancillary people like stenographers and clerks.


And hotels and restaurants and anything else that travelers use while in town for lawsuits.

It's like a tourism business except instead of being a nice place that people want to go, you drag them there with $625M blackmail.

The people on these juries know that if they stop being a haven for patent trolls, the cash cow goes away.


I'm 75-90% sure federal judges are on salary, and are not paid by the case. At least I hope this is so.


Federal judges are salaried and appointed for life except in cases of impeachment.


But the number of judges is based on caseload.

If they changed something so caseload fell by 75%, do you think some judges might lose their job?


Nope, not in the Federal court system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_judge#Te...

No Federal judge has ever been fired due to a reduction in the number of positions on the judge's court. (It's quite possible that a decreased caseload could result in fewer new judicial confirmations, but that affects would-be judges, not presently-serving judges.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: