> "Cunts"? Really? And you expect to be taken seriously by grownups?
I bear a very strong hatred to a handful of specific politicians for very specific reasons I can cite. Would you like a list of people and reasons I'd call them cunt/asshole?
Similarly, the fact you took the bait convinces me you honestly are unable to provide evidence of your conclusions on any reasonable scale and are simply unwilling to admit it. It was a test to see if you would do exactly what I expected and you did. Good job.
> I mean, I was going to ask you why it's not okay to invalidate the experiences of women talking about sexism in tech, but totally okay to invalidate the experiences of people with unpopular beliefs talking about how they've been mistreated on that basis. I don't think I'm going to bother, because I don't see that argument getting anywhere with you -- but, you know, that's really not because it's the argument that's flawed.
1) You've provided no evidence that is the case and I'm taking this an admission you are unable to do so.
2) There is evidence of sexism in tech. It may not be as widely and deeply researched as your previous attempt to link your failed argument to racism...but yeah. This is basic an admission you can't tell the difference between evidence of bigotry and a lack thereof.
I bear a very strong hatred to a handful of specific politicians for very specific reasons I can cite. Would you like a list of people and reasons I'd call them cunt/asshole?
Similarly, the fact you took the bait convinces me you honestly are unable to provide evidence of your conclusions on any reasonable scale and are simply unwilling to admit it. It was a test to see if you would do exactly what I expected and you did. Good job.
> I mean, I was going to ask you why it's not okay to invalidate the experiences of women talking about sexism in tech, but totally okay to invalidate the experiences of people with unpopular beliefs talking about how they've been mistreated on that basis. I don't think I'm going to bother, because I don't see that argument getting anywhere with you -- but, you know, that's really not because it's the argument that's flawed.
1) You've provided no evidence that is the case and I'm taking this an admission you are unable to do so.
2) There is evidence of sexism in tech. It may not be as widely and deeply researched as your previous attempt to link your failed argument to racism...but yeah. This is basic an admission you can't tell the difference between evidence of bigotry and a lack thereof.