> This is an area where immutable data structures are a no-brainer "right way" to avoid data races in the majority of cases
I continue to find your phrasing extremely off-putting, condescending and snobbish. I suggested a few ways of wording your concerns better, but it seems you're intent on remaining a snob.
I disagree that anything about your suggestion is a "no-brainer."
> I continue to find your phrasing extremely off-putting, condescending and snobbish. I suggested a few ways of wording your concerns better, but it seems you're intent on remaining a snob.
Thats a bit over the top, but I'll concede that my wording needs work. I enjoy discussing concrete problems and projects - hopefully fixing this will help get more of that. You did make some very good points as to why we avoid mutation, and I will try and evaluate Rust in more depth.
I continue to find your phrasing extremely off-putting, condescending and snobbish. I suggested a few ways of wording your concerns better, but it seems you're intent on remaining a snob.
I disagree that anything about your suggestion is a "no-brainer."