Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Hmm? The hash will be a fixed length, which is the only thing you'd be storing.



In order to get that hash you'd have to process the password in its entirety. But really, if they're that concerned about the buffer I see no reason to cap it at 8 or 10 rather than 1000.


Eh. That seems unlikely, assuming you're not writing your own routines. At most you'd get an out of memory error. I can calculate the SHA1 digest of a 1Bn character string without running into that problem.

So let's cap the length at 100k characters and call it a day.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: