Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I understand why you might arrive at that conclusion, but think about another level: What did Jessica Livingston lose or miss out on by not promoting herself to the public?

I would argue that she missed out on nothing that matters.




I think that's the calculus that she figured on when she made the decision not to be a public figure.

I suspect that the recent articles playing up her role are because she & YC realized that there is something they're missing out on: millions of potential female founders are not starting companies because they don't have strong role models. This hurts YC in a financial sense, but even beyond that: if your mission is to increase the amount of startups and innovation in the world, then having half the world's population disqualify themselves because they don't have many good examples of it being done before is losing out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: