Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think reputation should be the scarce resource for preventing sybil attacks, and not computing power via proof-of-work. The latter won't even work with new (and therefore small) blockchain networks, since a 51% attack is trivial. Reputation replaces distributed consensus with probabilistic value, relative to each participant. That's actually how currencies are discounted when being converted. Wildcat money during the free banking era was heavily discounted. Currencies and debts are accepted locally and from trusted people.



What does this comment mean?


It means we should move beyond distributed consensus. Forums and voting dont need it for one




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: