Wow, I had no idea this was the case. Thanks for sharing. I seem to remember that you're a lawyer so I'll have to assume you know what you're talking about. :)
> some third-party entity (and its employees) actively sifts through
Just to be clear, is this condition important to your statement? That is, can you store information with a third-party entity with the assumption that it's constitutionally "private" there if you don't let them sift through it? Say, a bank safe deposit box, or some sort of encrypted enterprise crowd storage, or cperciva's tarsnap?
> some third-party entity (and its employees) actively sifts through
Just to be clear, is this condition important to your statement? That is, can you store information with a third-party entity with the assumption that it's constitutionally "private" there if you don't let them sift through it? Say, a bank safe deposit box, or some sort of encrypted enterprise crowd storage, or cperciva's tarsnap?