Copyright infringement != plagiarism. They're not violating the copyright because they abide by the terms of the license.
They're also not plagiarising because they clearly cite its original source. They even go so far as to say "deeply rooted in" which seems to me like a euphamism for "virtually identical to".
The point here isn't that it's illegal or immoral, just kind of uninteresting.
They're also not plagiarising because they clearly cite its original source. They even go so far as to say "deeply rooted in" which seems to me like a euphamism for "virtually identical to".
The point here isn't that it's illegal or immoral, just kind of uninteresting.