Non issue to me. Typical media and security professionals hyperbole.
I have car insurance for my Porsche. According to the list it's vulnerable.
Chance of getting stolen? Quite small. If it does insurance pays in my case the full value not the depreciated value (age of car as only one reason). Not something I am worrying about.
How many cars are actually stolen as a result of this flaw?
Just another example of the security industrial complex fanning the flames...
It wasn't the "security-industrial complex" that caused a security-incompetent vendor to use legal threats to try to suppress disclosure. That's the story here.
I have car insurance for my Porsche. According to the list it's vulnerable.
Chance of getting stolen? Quite small. If it does insurance pays in my case the full value not the depreciated value (age of car as only one reason). Not something I am worrying about.
How many cars are actually stolen as a result of this flaw?
Just another example of the security industrial complex fanning the flames...