Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I found that minimizing transformations on your data is a principle you apply when you productionize. For most of the development cycle, you want to keep things as debuggable as possible (at the possible expense of performance), and intermediate data products + debugging hooks are a good way to do this.

This brings up a much bigger question of when to productionize, though. Most programs are never actually "done", but at some point you have to release to the public and hopefully get millions of users. You need to make the performance/maintainability tradeoff sometime. The later you push it off, the more productive you can be in the critical early stages, and the better a product you can bring to market. But if you push it off too long, you miss the market window entirely and don't get the benefit of user feedback.




Is this related to `Fusion' of functional programming? There the compiler removes some of intermediate structures.

E.g. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/deforest/defores...


But these are fundamental design issues. You can't change fundamental design when you "productionize"; coming up with that design and implementing it is the development cycle.


Productionize usually means "rewrite". I think that software engineers in general have become too averse to rewriting code; as long as you do it with the same team that wrote the prototype, it's often a good idea to throw away everything and start from scratch.

The development cycle for me is much more about collecting requirements than coming up with a design that satisfies those requirements. That's what iterative design is about - you try something out, see if it works for the user, see what other features are really necessary for it to work for the user, and then adjust as necessary. Once you know exactly what the software should do, coming up with a design that does it is fairly easy.

My current project is nearing its 3rd complete rewrite since September, plus nearly daily changes that rip out large bits of functionality and re-do them some other way.


"software engineers in general have become too averse to rewriting code"

Fervently agree. I was one of them.

No amount of rewriting is too much - as long as you constantly have a working app.


Productionize usually means "rewrite".

Oh ok, you meant something quite different than I thought, and I don't disagree.


I try not to have a 'fundamental design'. If you rely wholly on caching, you have no intermediate data structures, and code becomes easier to change in dramatic ways. This is the ideal I've been striving for.

Check out arc's defmemo function. Given the ability to memoize (or cache) function invocations, changing your data structures can become simply a matter of refactoring your function boundaries and deciding which ones perform caching.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: