Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

TechCrunch likes to stir the pot and create controversy, but I do get tired of them acting like they do no wrong. Maybe it's just me but I rarely see them mocking themselves. As mentioned in the comments by another entrepreneur:

When I launched OtherInbox at TechCrunch50 in 2008, being “stealth” was a requirement for participation. We had to be launching something new that no one had heard about and secrecy was so important that we were told that we would be kicked out if anything leaked.

Maybe this should be reconsidered for 2010?

However, I do partly agree with the article. Some people are wayy to tight lipped about what they are working on, there's rarely a reason why someone can't speak in generalities about their project without going into exact details.




That's a sign of a maturing media outlet. Wouldn't it be bizarre if the New York Times never had differing opinion pieces?

(Note: I'm not putting TC and the NYT in the same bucket, but this is a bad point to call them out on.)


Good point. My comment was also in regard to other stories I've read there, I just opted not to go into too many details for the sake of staying on topic.


I think you miss how TechCrunch becomes a town square on the weekends with guest posts by contributors. As the comment you cite points out, surely Arrington would disagree with Vivek, at least as far as TC50 is concerned. Perhaps he would tie himself in knots to agree with Vivek aside from the awesomeness that is TC50, but the idea that TechCrunch is just Arrington's voice at this point is a bit off the mark.

And it's not just TechCrunch. Henry Blodget doesn't agree with everything Frommer writes at TBI, Dean and Matt at VentureBeat don't even write about the same stuff, and so on.


Controversy gets attention. I mean, say what you will about it, but I'd like to point out that you did at least look at the article if not read it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: