That's the natural course of events. Take any school of thought, and each sect within would rather have its views represent that school without qualification. Certainly proponents of the Labour Theory of Value would rather it just be called the Theory of Value, and similarly proponents of the Subjective Theory of Value would rather _it_ be called the Theory of Value with any other requiring qualification.
Now, because we aren't (intrinsically) proponents of either, we qualify both so as to distinguish them. Either way, the renamed title is far better. "Feynman's concept of scientific integrity". Excellent title.
On a more important note, this approach of being the greatest critic of your ideas is probably a phenomenal way to make fault-tolerant software (not necessarily accounting for every eventuality, but being aware of as many as possible, and appropriately choosing to handle or not to handle them). I'm not nearly as good at it as I'd like to be.
Now, because we aren't (intrinsically) proponents of either, we qualify both so as to distinguish them. Either way, the renamed title is far better. "Feynman's concept of scientific integrity". Excellent title.
On a more important note, this approach of being the greatest critic of your ideas is probably a phenomenal way to make fault-tolerant software (not necessarily accounting for every eventuality, but being aware of as many as possible, and appropriately choosing to handle or not to handle them). I'm not nearly as good at it as I'd like to be.