Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more zkz's comments login

(I tried to upvote you and I downvoted you instead... sorry)


Looks like a critic to the job system (by mocking the annual performance reviews) to me.


The author has been answering questions here: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8ujgx/dear_prog...


Maybe you don't upload a thing, but people tag you in photos (and you have your tagged photos marked as private).


That's not Facebook invading your privacy, that's other people invading your privacy.


Furthermore, you are alerted of any tagging and you can choose to untag.

Some of us choose to keep the photos where we look sunburned and drunk tagged. Some of us untag everything that's not pristine. What's nice about Facebook is they make it easy to play it either way.


Wouldn't it be better to stay tagged? If you are tagged you can set privacy settings to restrict views on photos tagged of you. Without that the photos are still visible.


It's more a matter of people being able to go to your profile and click a "view photos" link. Some people don't want to restrict privacy, but they don't want drunken pictures on their profile. In the event that my boss looks at me on Facebook, he won't go searching through friends' photos looking for things I untagged.


Moral of the story, don't add your boss as a friend.


If Facebook exposes your account information to everyone when your friends tag you in their photos, and you have tagged photos set private, that's a definite leak of data.

However, if memory serves, Facebook does not link back to your account if friends tag you in their photos, and you have tagged photos marked as private.

I may misunderstand your problem, but I fail to see where Facebook is leaking any information.


This is what happened to me when I first signed up for Facebook. Even never having had an account with them in my life, 3 pages in to the signup it popped up a photo of my face and asked me if I wanted to set that as my profile photo. I left immediately and have never returned. I know that whatever I do online is a matter of public record, but it still creeped me out to the extreme.


Uh sorry


And the demo here: http://www.foxaweb.com/demos/mousegesture/GestureDemo.swf

Nice to see something so easy to program working so well


Glad to know it helped you, thank you!


Sometimes you just read about things you want to learn. At least that's the case of the books I talk about in this thread. For example, I'm driven by the curiosity to understand how some theories of physics work, particularly relativity and quantum theory. I've learned some extremely basic stuff about them, and I want to learn more, and more, and the more I learn, the harder it gets (it needs more mathematical tools, etc.).

Maybe a key is to read books that drive you towards a goal? I can understand your feeling, and I really appreciated your thread when it appeared in hn. But in my case the problem is different: I want to know a lot of things, and learning all of that will take me years, and a symptom of that is that I end up collecting tons of books that I keep reading slowly.


Ah, maybe that's why. When a child I was desperate for books, it was hard for me to get those (I had books, but I read them a lot faster than I could get them, I was always re-reading them). So I guess when I started having money I just started buying them, like in a rush, to compensate or something. I should realize it makes no sense anymore. Thank you.


Nice rules. I started to do something similar to your "only learn what you fall in love with". For some of the older books I bought once and I never read, now I know I will never read, because now I know better and I know they are garbage (or I know of better material now). So I won't waste my time reading those just to remove them from my todo list.

I guess I shouldn't have bought them either.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: