Monitoring request - dynamic configuration. Using Nagios requires configuration file changes and service reload Would prefer dynamic, on the fly configuration. Even better, configuration that can be adjusted externally, possibly from a web API endpoint. Better still, configuration that IS external, where the monitoring service queries an external service every X minutes to determine what to monitor.

Performant - In the realm of 6 oid monitoring of 50,000+ devices in 5 minute intervals

I'm working on a startup that does exactly this. It's AWS only and in private beta right now: https://opsee.com/

You believe the government had no hand in the success Facebook has had?

CCI Systems - Iron Mountain, MI (remote)

We build software for provisioning, monitoring and supporting networks. Most of our stack is in Ruby on Rails right now, but we are in the process of breaking things apart into smaller services that can be consumed by our SPAs and iOS/Android apps.

Perks:

* 100% remote team.

* Flexible schedule. Outside of a few regular meetings, get work done on your own schedule.

* Medical, dental and vision insurance.

* A stipend for investing in your health (e.g. gym memberships or buying your own workout equipment).

* ESOP program.

If you are interested, please reach out to zachary.gohr [at] ccisystems [dot] com.

----

Front End Engineer:

* Build UIs for things like provisioning network equipment, dashboards for reporting monitoring information and ticketing systems for the support team.

* Maintain a UI component kit, similar to Bootstrap and Foundation, that is shared between all of our applications.

* Most of our new UI work is in Angular, but we are actively exploring other tools, like React, for our desktop UIs and mobile development.

Disagree. On the consumer side, I care more about auto-playing audio than bandwidth. On the content owner side, I only want my videos to autoplay (in most circumstances) if it were accompanied by the audio. If I didn't care about audio accompaniment I can already use GIF.

Perhaps the iPhone should autoplay videos, but muted until you hit a speaker icon (or something). Either way, forcing everyone to use GIF is horrible because of how inefficient it is.

Agreed, I think of this as the "Vine" model of interaction and it's what I'd prefer. Plus leave off the icon if the webm video has no audio track.

I'd like a global option and also some simple per site UI.

This is how the click to play in Firefox works, it's nice. One thing I haven't figured out how to do is trust embeds from a site (for example, Youtube and Vimeo both have well behaved embeds, so I'd like to whitelist them, but not many of the third party sites I see them on).

That's only a UI issue. You don't need compression to be horribly inefficient to achieve that :)

For example <img src=vid.mp4> could autoplay looped video without audio, just like GIF, except using tiny fraction of bandwidth and CPU (thanks to HW acceleration) than GIF.

Green Bay, WI | Remote | Full Time Ruby/Rails, Python/Django, AngularJS, SASS, Ansible, NodeJS Contact me for a resume Twitter, Github, or username[dot]com using the same username you see here.

I just finished up the front-end of a large pilot project for a fortune 500 retail company (in-store, touch-screen) using AngularJS and SASS and I'm at a good point to look for an opportunity if one arises. My preferred backend is Ruby on Rails but I've previously done multiple projects with Python and Django (also Flask.)

I approve this message, as I am a web software developer in the midwest. I'm also involved in a great startup focused community here, http://digitalfertilizer.org/ with a network of high quality developers and designers, many of whom are full-time employed by startups all across the country.

I'm also on the market for remote work. Same username on Twitter.

Opinion on a good CRM that isn't Salesforce?

http://www.zoho.com is the one I have been using recently, but unfortunately I don't have much experience with Salesforce to make a proper comparison.

I've heard good things about this service (haven't used it though): https://getbase.com/

There are so many options! One that a friend of mine has put together is - http://getmysky.com/

I really like http://www.karmacrm.com - probably should have included that in my list

Capsule CRM - www.capsulecrm.com

The concern, at least for me, is not that a "public" review being used in a "public" way, it's that these businesses are now paying Google for my review and I get no cut. When I wrote this review I didn't write it to help this business out, per se, I wrote it because I wanted to help potential consumers decide where to do business based on my experiences.

That's the way it should be. Otherwise, you'd be incentivized to leave (dishonestly) positive reviews.

I never claimed there was a good solution, because the point you make is very valid.

Why did you put public in quotes?

Emphasis. A good number of those defending Google are saying they can do whatever they want with your reviews because they are public.

Hey shykes,

This is something I'm still not quite clear on. According to the issues in mention here: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/1185 it is possible to do what StavrosK is asking. What am I missing? Why would a volume need an initial state when when the goal can be accomplished with a bind mount?

I also +1'd the documentation issue because I can't seem to wrap my head around what the current state of volumes and mounting is. Appreciate any direction you could point me in.

> Why would a volume need an initial state when when the goal can be accomplished with a bind mount?

This is in the special case where you want the application itself to determine the initial state of the volume. For example, the developer might want the database pre-loaded with a certain schema, default data and so on. External volumes/bind mounts are a way for the sysadmin to override how and where the contents of a volume are stored.

Re: documentation, you can take a look at this example: http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/examples/couchdb_data_volume...

I hope this helps! Feel free to join the IRC channel (#docker on freenode), it's unusually active and helpful, I'm very proud of how nice the people are on there :)

Basically. One thing to consider is the fact that decoupling applications and services they interact with is generally considered a good practice. What services does a web application need? Generally speaking, a web process to handle requests, a database, and maybe some in-memory storage such as memcache. What docker can do is script the creation of these services as containers that can be deployed "anywhere." So say you have your web app now, and your 3 services are on a single server and the load is getting heavy because of database queries. Docker makes it extremely easy to reliably move the services between servers to handle the load better.

Albeit this is a very simplified vision, I don't think the complete use cases for docker have been hashed out quite yet. tl;dr dev ops is about to get magnitudes easier.