Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zfg's comments login

This is the power of WebAssembly. It brings every language to the browser.

Clearly Jack Ma should have pledged his commitment to China's core socialist values like Musk did: https://www.mediaite.com/news/elon-musk-signs-letter-pledgin...

And maybe Jack Ma should also have advocated for Taiwan's submission to China like Musk did: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/08/elon-musk...


China requires that pledge for basically anyone with power or wealth. For example, they added a new law, forcing all of the AI companies in China (like DeepSeek) to uphold socialist values and all that. And TikTok, which they pretend is a separate company from ByteDance based in Singapore, forces US executives to sign a pro CCP pledge as well:

https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/14/tiktok-forced-staff-oaths...

This is why tariffs, divestment from China, and divestment of Chinese ownership in American companies or land is important. I also think it is reasonable to treat such pledges made by American residents to a foreign government as treasonous.


Maybe not treasonous but ineligible for whatever position Musk has now...


> IMO the only thing that will defeat the plan is a nationwide general strike

Or a boycott of their products. Save America: don't buy Tesla.


The vice president sure doesn't:

https://www.newsweek.com/jd-vance-comment-questioning-court-...

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gx3j5k63xo

This isn't a new idea for J.D. Vance. He was saying the same thing 3 years ago:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right...

The philosophy behind this thinking comes from Curtis Yarvin. He believes American democracy is a failed project and it should be replaced with an American monarchy:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarv...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

America fought a war of independence to rid itself of monarchy. Yarvin and Vance want to bring it back.


These people are treasonous. Yes, I said it, and I will keep saying it. If you don't believe in the rule of law, get thee to some other country, you don't belong in this one.

> Vice-president JD Vance has cited Yarvin as an influence, saying in 2021, "So there's this guy Curtis Yarvin who has written about these things," which included "Retire All Government Employees," or RAGE, written in 2012. Vance said that if Trump became president again, "I think what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, and replace them with our people. And when the courts stop you, stand before the country and say, 'The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.'

They'll probably have a big dent in sales this year. Musk has managed to turn the Tesla brand into swasticars.

He shouldn't be CEO of Tesla. He doesn't work there anymore.


> Big fail on my part, obviously. Don’t make the same mistake I did. Pay attention.

These systems encourage people to stop paying attention. There will never be perfect vigilance or perfect reaction time from the driver.


> By 'reflexive' I mean when the rapid-response system I just described takes over and reacts from "cache", so to speak, to quickly counter a threat.

That's exactly what's happening when people flag articles like this.

So what's the plan to achieve reflective flagging?


My sense is that this is true with many but not all flags. See https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... for past explanations.

What's the plan? I guess the plan is continue to turn off flags on specific submissions that people bring to our attention and which seem to clear the bar according to the principles I've outlined in this and other threads.


Something simple and direct you can do is don't buy Tesla. It may now genuinely be in America's national interest to not buy Tesla.

There's no point giving Musk more money, power, and influence. He's now calling for the impeachment of judges because he thinks they're in his way:

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5134725-elon-musk-impe...

He wants any opposition or limit or restraint to him gone. Here's an interview with Kara Swisher about Musk's mentality that's worth watching:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xXLycFv5Gc


> If the executive refuses to abide by the laws of the country, who has control to stop it?

Three years ago J.D. Vance and others were already thinking about this and anticipating court cases:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right...

To quote the article: “I think Trump is going to run again in 2024,” [Vance] said. “I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.” “And when the courts stop you,” he went on, “stand before the country, and say—” he quoted Andrew Jackson, giving a challenge to the entire constitutional order—“the chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.”

They've been preparing themselves to ignore judicial rulings and they may well do that.



Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: