i feel like this entire .txt was drafted by GPT. it contains enough of what a LLM would already know about knuth, wolfram, wolfram alpha/language, etc.
Or you can just have the world’s simplest API by design possible… An API can just be obvious endpoint documentation made super simple. https://api.corgi.cam/v1/
I'm pessimistic enough to think that nowadays, due to social requirements for the saturated startup scene, that classic story of a single tech founder being matched with their biz cofounder via joining an incubator/accelerator is merely a myth of bygone days.
If you are currently unable to find a business development co-founder, and you are asking for assistance to find potential candidates, a goal-oriented environment or social mixer(s) sponsored by an accelerator/incubator may bear fruit regardless of whether you actually apply or go through with a program.
In other words, I'm thinking more of the peripheral social benefits (where "social" here means "expose oneself to possible business development co-founder candidates") than the actual programs themselves. Since it doesn't sound like you are sure what traits to look for, even if such a course of action doesn't turn up a good candidate, one hopes that you'll end up with a better idea at the end of the process; possibly worth putting aside the pessimism.
If you're feeling plucky or feel the opportunity cost of the search will be too great to bear due to a massive loss of momentum, you will probably need to try it alone for now to get a feel for the exact skillset a candidate could bring to the table.
three is a 3d engine (ish) - famo.us tries to also provide ui layers and such in a complete framework (that allegedly also includes physics, the works, etc)
i wish that there wasn't a double standard where open source is expected to be well-documented or elegant (etc). (especially for smaller scale projects that don't have the infrastructure / time)
for OSS projects that are hard(er) to read, the question goes - why hasn't the community helped clean it up / document / etc?
summary: P/E too positive, hence acquisitions needed on the #BillionDollarNonsense
also, when your company is offered billions of dollars, I guess it's to not repeat Groupon's mistake of keeping principle and not letting it be bought... the chances of it IPO-ing that much are low. :(
