Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | unboxingelf's commentslogin

1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code.

Who cares. From one walled garden to the next. Renting identities on permissioned networks is so tiresome.


I care - I care that users are leaving a neo-nazi led platform. Problem might be that the new platform's leader also seems to support the current king, sorry, president.


Threads is not a walled garden though. It's got Activity Pub integration and you can follow Fediverse accounts already. I think the other way around it's still a work in progress.


It will remain a work in progress forever. There's no incentive to implement anything further.


One day Facebook used open XMPP so you could chat across networks. It does not anymore. Why would we expect AP integration to survive?

Also due to large amount of spam, many instances don't federate with Threads.


Till you can't.

Once they all had apis.


The irony on this post is palpable.


It’s actually not, it’s not apparent what you mean at all. As a result this reads as a comment that doesn’t engage anyone except those who share your particular thoughts.

Could you perhaps spell out what irony you are referring to?


You're literally doing the "and yet you participate in society" bit...


I argue there is a more fundamental problem with the money: Debasement.

Debasement is an invisible tax and its effects far outweigh individuals bypassing taxes.


... which is a different topic.

This thread is about the fair taxation of AI, if any.


  It's a massive flaw in how Azure works and why it's 10x more complicated than AWS or GCP.
Wait until you try OCI.


That's never going to happen. I'm more or less locked into AWS at this point, though for my personal stuff I'm using my linode server a lot.

I thought Oracle Cloud was designed by AWS alum and was supposed to be solid?


Nice thanks, I was finally able to design the schema for my dog turd tracker. The foreign key to the smells table was a great suggestion!


You’re not the only one.


Who is macOS designed for? I assume a non negligible customer base are software professionals and this iOSification of the desktop is borderline hostile. I don’t get it.


66% of Mac users are female,

around 55.7% of Mac users in 2024 are aged 18-34,

macOS has a 29.62% share of the U.S., but only 15.1% of the global PC market

Macs still maintain strong pedigree in graphic design and visual arts

(from https://www.spyhunter.com/shm/macos-stats/)

I'm a software developer as well and I avoid programming on the Mac whenever possible (i.e. developing on Linux and just go to the Mac to build and test). Since the last OS version, you cannot even download and run precompiled open source software without being an expert, and we can expect that Apple will even close the present work-arounds for "security reasons" (what a good justification for all kinds of monopolistic and patronizing business decisions).


In addition to self hosting, anonymous access to hosted inference is another interesting path.

There’s a “A Decentralised LLM Routing Marketplace” being built out on nostr that leverages ecash.

https://www.routstr.com/


The Simulation Theory presents the following trilemma, one of which must be true:

1. Almost all human-level civilizations go extinct before reaching a technologically mature “posthuman” stage capable of running high-fidelity ancestor simulations.

2. Almost no posthuman civilizations are interested in running simulations of their evolutionary history or beings like their ancestors.

3. We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.


If you take the idea of it needing to be a constructed simulation you get the dream argument. If you add that one can't verify anyone else having subjective experience you get Boltzmann brain. If you add the idea that maybe the ancestor simulations are designed to teach us virtuous behavior through repeated visits to simulation worlds you get the karmic cycle, and Boltzmann brain + karmic cycle is roughly the egg theory.

I think some/all of these things can roughly true at the same time. Imagine an infinite space full of chaotic noise that arises a solitary Boltzmann brain, top level universe and top level intelligence. This brain, seeking purpose and company in the void, dreams of itself in various situations (lower level universes) and some of those universes' societies seek to improve themselves through deliberate construction of karmic cycle ancestor simulation. A hierarchy of self-similar universes.

It was incredibly comforting to me to think that perhaps the reason my fellow human beings are so poor at empathy, inclusion, justice, is that this is a karmic kindergarten where we're intended to be learning these skills (and the consequences for failing to perform them) and so of course we're bad at it, it's why we're here.


But there are lots of critiques of that supposed trilemma.

Why would beings in simulations be conscious?

Or maybe running simulations is really expensive and so it's done sometimes (more than "almost none") but only sometimes (nowhere near "we are almost certainly").

Or simulations are common but limited? You don't need to simulate a universe if all you want to do is simulate a city.

The "trilemma" is an extreme example of black-and-white thinking. In the real world, things cost resources and so there are tradeoffs -- so middle grounds are the rule, not extremes.


KYC only hurts law abiding citizens.

Criminals just use stolen identities (from breaches of KYC data).


Depends on the level of KYC. If you're just doing social and birthdate, its easy to bypass. You could add additional checks like check phone and email which are readily available from data brokers. You could send a physical mail to the address in the credit report with a PIN. It depends on level of the level friction you want your KYC program to go. When I built a KYC at a neobank, we focused more on verifying that you were in the US. We could detect proxies and if you make the signup in a mobile app, you can pin the cert which will stop automated attacks. We relied on fingerprinting devices but a lot of methods don't work due to mobile OS providers cracking down on them.


Gotta love anarcho tyranny


I had to look it up: The term "anarcho-tyranny" was coined by writer Sam Francis to describe a situation where a state oppresses citizens' lives but is unable or unwilling to enforce laws that protect them. Francis believed that anarcho-tyranny is built into the managerial system and cannot be solved by voting out incumbents or fighting corruption. He argued that the political left has dominated politics because of a progressive managerial class that has increased state power and bureaucratization, while eroding the power of other authorities. Francis believed that the only way to restore sanity was to devolve power back to law-abiding citizens. Francis also used the term to describe an armed dictatorship without rule of law. Some commentators have used the term to describe situations where governments focus on confiscating weapons instead of stopping looters. Thomas Fleming has described anarcho-tyranny as "law without order" and suggested that people should follow the advice of a boxing referee and protect themselves at all times.

But in reality it was the right that was setting us up for failure all this time, going back to at least Reagan as California's governor reducing funding to schools. Then Nixon doubled down.


https://www.cato.org/blog/new-k-12-productivity-chart It's hard to believe that education is getting less funding. There seems to be a perception that spending more money on education will result in smarter students or higher test scores but that doesn't seem to be the case. There is more money spent on educating children through K-12. Also Richard Nixon was president before Ronald Reagan so Nixon wouldn't be able to double down on his successors policies. Unless you mean Governor Ronald Reagan who started his leadership in 1967 with Nixon's presidency starting in 1969


The best defense to scams is to not fall for scams.


The best defense to scams is maintaining a high trust society.


I'm having trouble understanding exactly what it is you're trying to say. Could you elaborate?


For thousands of years western societies executed or exiled troublemakers. This created the selective pressure that led to high trust society.


I don't know what kind of education you were brought up in, but lynch mobs are not cool, actually.


The left has done more damage you our education system by removing standards and getting rid of separate schools for the smartest students than the right ever could by cutting funding. Most recently in California they got rid of calculus class in high school. Meanwhile we continue to increase spending and are near the highest in the world and our education system is trash https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmd/education-exp...


Rest assured, California high school students can still take calculus, in fact they can even take "AP" courses


Bush2 started no child left behind before that.


They don't if they don't have to.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: