You can use a steno mask so your voice doesn't disturbs others but also so that the voices from coworkers and other background noise doesn't disturb the speech-to-text software.
It would look funky though, and I've read from people having problems with their voice after an 8 hour day speaking software.
On youtube is a person who shows how to mod [0] a cheap midi keyboard for use as a steno device and also has videos showing how the typing on the michaela-midi looks [1].
Maybe better and more time consuming optimizations? 2 mio LOC vs. 26 mio LOC probably doesn't help either. Maybe there is some bottleneck somehwere in the software or hardware?
As a layman I would describe them as implicits like in current Scala [0] but better (easier to reason about). One thing which they allow is ad-hoc polymorphism like typeclasses.
servethehome had an interesting paragraph in their review:
> We are also not allowed to name because Intel put pressure on the OEM who built it to have AMD not disclose this information, despite said OEM having their logo emblazoned all over the system. Yes, Intel is going to that level of competitive pressure on its industry partners ahead of AMD’s launch.
Can you expand on this a bit? Who is disallowing whom to not name what? From my first reading of your comment, it seems like Intel is pushing partners to not disclose their relationship with AMD? Is that not, like, almost cartel-like behavior?
It's probably best to ask servethehome since I've also understood it that way when first reading it but on a second read I'm not sure. The wording also reads to me as if they forgot a word or two (but maybe that's because I'm not a native speaker).
Here is the entire section:
> We are going to present a few data points in a min/ max. The minimum is system idle. Maximum is maximum observed through testing for the system. AMD specifically asked us not to use power consumption from the 2P test server with pre-production fan control firmware we used for our testing. We are also not allowed to name because Intel put pressure on the OEM who built it to have AMD not disclose this information, despite said OEM having their logo emblazoned all over the system. Yes, Intel is going to that level of competitive pressure on its industry partners ahead of AMD’s launch.
Interesting, this seems more flexible then the solution AMD previously used in their Radeon Pro SSG [0], in which they connected a 2TB NVMe SSD RAID directly to the GPU by placing it on the GPU PCB (which the application sees as 2 TB GPU memory since HBCC comines the SSD storage with the 16 GB HBM).
It would look funky though, and I've read from people having problems with their voice after an 8 hour day speaking software.
https://talktech.com/wp-content/uploads/img_4924.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3WJubnhMEQ