Incidentally, I discovered this article while learning what '[sic]' even means.
"The typical editorial usage of sic is to inform the reader that any errors in a quotation did not arise from editorial errors in the transcription, but are intentionally reproduced as they appear in the original source being quoted", from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic
Is "game-changing" supposed to imply changing the game to a completely different one? Like, is the metaphor that we were playing soccer, and then we switched to paintball or basketball or something? I always understood it to mean a big change within the same game - like we’re still playing soccer, but because of a goal or a shift, the team that was on defense now has to go on offense...
I recently had the pleasure of using XSLT after never having seen it before. I used it to transform a huge 130K line XML manifest with MAPI property metadata into C# source code. It was so simple, readable, and intuitive to use.
I learnt XSLT in university back in the early/mid part of the first decade of this century. I didn't much enjoy it. I've never used it, but all my career I've had to deal with terrible ad hoc templating languages. I recently had total freedom to choose what terrible ad hoc templating language to use, and I chose XSLT. I actually totally liked it: and it seemed to have everything I've needed. In previous jobs, there was always tickets that amounted to "make a fork of the terrible ad hoc templating language and hack it until it does this", but I reckon XSLT could do everything and then some.
> I got the impression that the guide didn't know anything about what they were talking about w.r.t internals or how it's used
I got the same impression, and I think it's a fair critique of the video and the presenter. OP simply acknolwedged that unconcious bias may be affecting their judgement, for better or for worse.
reply