> As a European, I am aware of American cultural and military hegemony but I much rather argue with raging capitalists about workers rights compared to raging authoriatarian communists who kill everybody not on their ideological side.
Isn't this their main point? There's plenty of examples of killing those not on their side outside of "authoriatarian communists" (hint, Iraq, Gaza). You still believe in them and that's fine, but there is a lot of Western projection that they are right and others are not, which is the sense I get from your comment. It's reasonable for people to be against this and "anti-Western". It's also ok to see the strong development brought in from the West and support them. But this is a point for the locals to work through and not pushing a narrative like this one seems to be just as much pro-Western propaganda ignoring anything against it as the other way around.
The point, I guess, is that we had and still have mass organized protests against what happened in Iraq and Gaza. Some leaders paid a political price for that.
Freelance/contract - if you have mildly above average skills and a network, you should be able to find these contracts and they will pay for a mild lifestyle.
I truly believe you won't be able to find a full time job because your preconception is half-retirement. You want to just be stuck at a level of a new grad salary - no company wants anyone that is stuck, they want people that will grow. Once you've chosen to stop growing, freelance is probably the best bet since companies, big or small, don't care about growth fron their contractors. At least, that's been what I settled on after startup burnout.
This comes and goes, maybe it will just go again. But it's getting old, basically any OSS projects that have source on GitHub but only push to docker hub need to get to double pushing it to ghcr since the ones that do will be getting priority in image decisions.
As far as I can tell the article has been misinterpreted causing much lost hours by HN commenters. By saying users don't care about your tech stack, it is saying you should care about your tech stack, i.e it matters, presenting some bullet points on what to keep in mind when caring about your tech stack. Or to summarize, be methodological, not hype-following.
Agree the article is not clearly presented but it's crazy to see the gigantic threads here that seem to be based on a misunderstanding.
Interesting article but have to raise the issue of calling just any dog a doge. While I can understand the difficulty of resisting a joke, doges deserve better.
I don't follow what this article is trying to say - if the point is to have more interdisciplinary research, isn't project-focused funding precisely what's needed? Researcher focus seems like it would focus on that researcher's discipline, not an interdisciplinary team.
In fact, my experience in a Japanese lab made me feel funding precisely goes towards researchers rather than projects if professors count as researchers. Professors get funding for their labs, and while there will be project proposals the perceived value of that professor is key for closing it.
Maybe the article is focused more on private research labs than universities though.
This will be flagged just as much as the other one but still just saying - there's no such thing as "just quoted" in reality right? To be more concrete, quoting is always to support some sort of narrative, just look at all the quotes or citations in a typical research paper.
It runs in a single job, where single job = single runner. To use two runners/jobs to build multiplatform, each will need to push an untagged image and the shas are aggregated into a manifest in a third job. Definitely doable and the recipes will come out.
Personally prefer just using Go/ko whenever possible ;)
Isn't this their main point? There's plenty of examples of killing those not on their side outside of "authoriatarian communists" (hint, Iraq, Gaza). You still believe in them and that's fine, but there is a lot of Western projection that they are right and others are not, which is the sense I get from your comment. It's reasonable for people to be against this and "anti-Western". It's also ok to see the strong development brought in from the West and support them. But this is a point for the locals to work through and not pushing a narrative like this one seems to be just as much pro-Western propaganda ignoring anything against it as the other way around.