I guess I'm pointing out that there are blessed uses of quotes aside from direct quotations and I don't understand why this particular thing has carve outs as being bad.
Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)
> We use publicly available data to show that published papers in top psychology, economics, and general interest journals that fail to replicate are cited more than those that replicate. This difference in citation does not change after the publication of the failure to replicate. Only 12% of postreplication citations of nonreplicable findings acknowledge the replication failure.
This is at least partially a failure in publication. Once a paper is published, it's usually left up in the same state forever. If it fails to replicate, that data is published somewhere else. So when someone references the paper, and the diligent reader follows up and reads the reference, it looks convincing, just as it did when first published. It's not reasonable to expect the reader, or even the writer, to be so well versed in all the thousands and thousands of papers published that they know when something has failed to be replicated.
What we need is for every paper to be published alongside a stats card that is kept up to date. How many times it's been cited, how many times people tried to replicate it, and how many times they failed.
This feels like some sort of truth telling paradox, where if you assume the study is true, then seeing a citation like this means it's likely not true.
searching "limerence dopamine" will get you basically all of the info you need. skip the first 6-8 obviously AI gen articles and hit wikipedia or some of the more reputable Medium writers. that said, chances are the first links, even if AI generated, will link to some sort of research.
I don't know how a condo building could operate without some kind of shared ownership structure for the common areas and shared infrastructure. What are the alternatives to an HOA in a condo building?
Rent only has to exceed the property's operating costs -- things like mortgage interest, property tax, paying a manager, insurance, repairs and maintenance -- for the landlord to come out ahead. Paying off the principal is a capital expense.
Surely this must not have been a like-for-like comparison, unless your landlord is very charitable or somehow secured a much lower property tax rate than your coworker did (as is possible in California through various Prop 13 mechanisms). Have you looked up what the property tax bill is on your apartment?
He had a nice house in an expensive area. I think his wife was someone important at a bank.
I was in a one bedroom apartment, so not like-for-like, but I didn’t need or want anymore space than I had. I was also in a nice area, and in the nicest apartments in that area, as far as I could tell.
A couple people who moved out there when I did bought places, and I heard nothing but regrets from them a year later.
reply