Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | themadturk's comments login

I remember a version of WordPerfect on an AT&T Unix workstation someone was selling in the early/mid-90s. I wanted one so bad.

Part of the appeal of WordPerfect (and Reveal Codes) in the legal industry was the ability to create a document that look exactly what you needed it to look like. Appellate briefs, as I remember, had to be no more than a certain number of pages of text of a certain font and point size with specified margins and line spacing, and doing that in Word was doable but a nightmare.

Count me in!

Lotus I-II-III?

After watching the first season I (a left-coast Yank) started reading Mick Herron's novels and had no idea what the Barbican was. Kept forgetting to look it up, as I kept getting caught up in the action...

It also didn't support 80 characters on the screen (or even the 52-or-however-many characters of the Osborne).

I tried. Didn't work very well.

The IBM PC wasn't really a family computer like the C64 was. It was a business machine that could be fun for the family when dad or mom were done with work.

> I've heard they aren't common in America

They're getting more popular in the Puget Sound area. We have been re-engineering streets to include roundabouts all over the place. I think they're a great thing, but too many people still stop at the wrong time.


I live in the PNW. I like roundabouts where they fit, but near our house there's a super-busy one with multiple lanes that is just an accident magnet. People are constantly cutting across lanes while entering and exiting and sideswiping each other. It was originally a 4-way traffic light and it should have stayed that way. OTOH, we have a 4-way stop sign that is also an accident magnet during rush hour (when there's so much traffic that right-of-way is often unclear) and it should be a roundabout instead. Other than accidents from cutting across lanes during turns, the main failure mode I see in roundabouts is that they're subject to starvation while stop lights or stop signs aren't: if traffic coming one way never stops, then traffic to its right may never have a chance to go. I see this dealt with informally by folks voluntarily yielding but it's far from ideal (and unsafe because it's making an ad-hoc exception to a rule).

Is there concern for AI-produced slop in Wikipedia? I have the 2024-01 version which may be out of date, but may also have less slop.


Look at the Wired article on fighting people rewriting the history of Germany and the George Galloway article. Any one can edit it, including a recently convicted ex-congressman


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: