Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thehme's comments login

I am glad I found this post and will be checking it out. Thanks.


Sprint promised LTE service a while back and had a slew of phone with this technology as an option that could be enabled. On the East Coast, Sandy came and destroyed much of the infrastructure we were told, so the LTE technology hasn't really been working as we wish and we told it would. With recent mergers, it may be true that these "small" big companies don't "have the financial resources to compete against...larger players [(Verizon, AT&T)], nor the suite of offerings to attract customers who can get a whole host of services from other rivals. As a result, both sides believe that the only way to remain relevant is to combine."

I have had Sprint for over 10 years and I like Sprint, my service is fine, and the price that I pay is great. I hope this does not change if this deal gets past the antitrust regulators.


The author is completely right. When Apple announced that it will allow families to share music, books, etc., the first thing that came to my mind was: "Apple is trying to lock us in." I can already share my music, perhaps because I know how to do it, even if it is a tedious process, but I can see how this would keep users with Apple, if they don't know any better. Then they talked about swift and did not confirm it will be Open Source, so this also was a red flag for me that they are trying to further lock-down. When I think about it, this is how Apple became profitable and big, so it makes sense that it is looking for ways to stay in control, even if it alienates some.


But even Swift is lake of portability, so is Objective C. For example, It is hard to port iOS project in Objective C to android. So I think Swift doesn't change anything?


According to some articles while "there are many tools available to port Objective-C to Java i.e port an app from iOS to Android...porting Swift apps to Android will now become a tough task for developers."

http://thehackernews.com/2014/06/apples-new-swift-programmin...


Swift "greatly benefited from the experiences hard-won by many other languages in the field, drawing ideas from Objective-C, Rust, Haskell, Ruby, Python, C#, CLU, and far too many others to list." I have been wondering if in fact this language will be Open Source, since it is said to have taken from other programming languages, some of which are Open Source, yet the decision to make it Open Source has not been made? Lock down.


In general, a _language_ is not open source; its _implementation_ is.


Right, well, let's see what happens. I kindda agree with Gordon Haff (http://www.cnet.com/news/apples-new-swift-coding-language-ho...) on being disappointed that Apple did choose a more open platform, but I suppose this can change in time, like with Microsoft recent changes.


Could be a regional issue? North East seems fine. Loading quickly and access does seem okay as well. Gl.


I'm in the Northeast as well (NJ) and getting 500 errors consistently.


Yes, it is. I am in Central Europe and Drive loads just fine.


For me (also EU), it was down for around 10 minutes.


I did the total opposite of what this article discussed; I spent a few minutes reading this blog post instead of being productive and paying attention to my work. While there is true value to concentrating/focusing, so we can be creative and get important stuff done, the author's lack of tolerance for distractions (good or bad) may be going below a healthy level. Seriously, the "I’m also letting go of second chances. One strike and you’re out" would make us a terrible persons.


Attention lost. Woops!

"Error establishing a database connection"


Not my fault this was broken. What is this? HS?


I think you're getting downvoted because you're being snide about it, not because you stated the fact.


How is this being snide? Anyways, thanks for your input. I actually think we come to read articles that sound interesting, and if these are not accessible, our attention is lost, so we move on; not all of us have all day. Anyways, someone was just on a power trip; they think that because they can down vote, they can do so for anything, even when it points out actual problems with a blog/site.


Metric measurements just make sense. I never understood why the US does not adapt and use this system. I was glad my engineering education used it, so that once again, I felt back at home using the metric system. Ask any US born engineer and they will likely tell you that if they had been using the metric system all their lives, they wouldn't have had to waste all that time trying to learn it in college for physics, etc..


Not sure if anyone else picked this up, but for those who don't know everything about startups, this article does not really help. All points are missing more details and some are written assuming you know what is being meant without explaining clearly. For #1, I see that the cofounder did not contribute to the project, but what happened? why? was there a work contract or expectations that were not met? etc. For #2, what does the author mean by "It turns out that not every company in the US is incorporated in Delaware"; the author assumes everyone knows what is means and then adds that they "are incorporated in New York State"?. Then for #3, the author writes:

"I asked what was the matter, and my attorneys said that “regulations” prevented them from sending it. A full two weeks after they received the check, they wired the money back to our investor and they asked him to wire the money to us directly. How embarrassing."

While I think I figured out what was meant, somewhat, aside from the "regulations" part, it was not clearly describe who was asking who what and why exactly. I still don't understand what was not done correctly by the friend attorney.


Regarding #3, the regulations were "blue sky laws," which are more appropriate for shady securities that scam elderly women into giving away their pensions to hucksters.

This wouldn't have happened if the friend attorney was used to dealing with startups.


I doubt it was a "blue sky" issue. Since it seems like it was an "Accredited Investor" and they would have signed an waiver to that effect.

Probably had more to do with the firm acting as a broker in the deal, and violating some state statute on unlicensed brokers/dealers. They deposited the funds, so they would be acting as an intermediary. If unlicensed could face serious fines.


Hummm...ok, thanks, I will look into this and see if I understand it better.


I really respect the humanity with which this story is told; kudos to the dad, and Jamie, of course. This heartfelt story makes you realize how little we know about people with mental handicaps and the struggles they face, even is the best of circumstances. It only saddens me to think that similar children/young adults/adults out there, do not have the access to some of these programs because of they do not have such resourceful parents.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: