Even an App is free, it doesn't mean you can distribute it without permission? I would say the case apply to restaurants as well. I can see good restaurants leverage this to negotiate favorable terms with platforms.
> Google prohibits retaliation against any worker here at Google who reports or participates in an investigation of a possible violation of our Code, policies, or the law. If you believe you are being retaliated against, please contact Ethics & Compliance.
Well, it is safe to say this is hot garbage then.
I would love Google to remove all the self entitled BS from this statement, so they can act as an everyday faceless big company which is anyway what it is doing, not some moral beacon for the mass to look up to.
The statement exists only to generate traffic for the news outlet for spinning.
It is at will research funded by google, the researcher makes it clear what their findings were, they want the original research paper to have its say based on results not spin.
If google wants specific outcomes from research, go to the marketing department instead of funding real research.
Many of the comments on this thread are expressing concern and (more or less) asking 'why does it work like this?' and (in some cases) 'it would be better if it didn't work like this."
It’s mostly that you can only pull instructions off the queue from the front, whereas with ARM since the size is fixed you can just pull them off anywhere.
I think with x86 Intel and AMD are basically brute forcing this by just pulling instructions off a random position and hoping it’s a correct offset, but it’s very inefficient.
I would be more in the mood to praise Oracle for this development, had they not shown how far they could go to hurt Java's community/ecosystem just to squeeze a penny out of it.
I do think Google has good engineers, but they are really not that indispensable