Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | smrtinsert's commentslogin

Great stuff. My local coyotes are also offering chicken coop services free of charge.

The people for whom I've seen "coding is the hard part" are typically promoted out of the way or fired. They never entered a flow like those who considered it easy and addictive. The latter are the pillars of the eng team.


My feed isn't as bad as this one, mostly current events, tech, music, politics which are my interests. Trolls/ai/bots are everywhere, but so are people callling it out, so if anything I would guess engagement is up. To be fair, my politics seems to be around 60/40 agree/disagree with my political preference which I actually think is a massive improvement over what it used to be which was 90% agreeable to me. I enjoy engaging on pages of the opposing view.


Why are we still supporting this person? His cars are being outclassed internationally and he's directly meddling in this countries politics. He spectacularly failed (or wasn't it blatantly misled) the CA government with regard to the tunneling, and damaged the public sector while shutting down oversight and regulatory bodies against his companies.

Where is the benefit? These awesome tech demos? It just screams charlatan to me on an epic scale. I see no reason a government shouldn't step in to assume control if its "too big to fail".


SpaceX launches more rockets than the rest of the world combined with a better price and far better safety record.


providers are also adding hidden characters and attempting to watermark if memory serves.


It's more complex than that. It's called SynthID-text and biases the probabilities of token generation in a way that can be recovered down the line.


The search for agency is heartbreaking. Yikes.


Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?

Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing.


> Technically no

There's no technical basis for stating that.


Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic.


No there is a logical errror in there. You are implicitly asserting that the trained thing is an imitation, whereas it is only the output that is being imitated.

A flip way of saying it is that we are evolving a process that exhibits the signs of what we call thinking. Why should we not say it is actually thinking?

How certain are you that in your brain there isn’t a process very similar?


I never asserted it is an imitation.

I am simply asking a question. If anything I am only asserting the possibility that it is an imitation. I am more saying that there is no method to tell the difference on which possibility is true. Is it an imitation or is it not? The argument is ultimately pointless because you cannot prove it either way.

The only logical error is your assumptions and misinterpretation of what I said and meant.


I said "implicitly asserting."

But to carry your argument one step further, if there is no difference between imitation and the real thing, is there anything meaningful to be debated here? "Is it an imitation or is it not?" isn't even a valid question in that context. Imitation === The Real Thing.


I literally told you what I was asserting and made it completely explicit. So what you assumed I was implying was wrong.

I never said there is no difference. There is a difference, the difference is just not discernible or observable.

Let me give you an example. It’s like an unsolved murder. You find a victim who is stabbed, you know he was killed, we know someone killed him, but we don’t know who.

In the case of AI is the same. We know certain things about it, but if it produces output indistinguishable from AGI then we cannot discern whether it is an imitation or the actual thing. There does exist a difference but we cannot meaningfully determine it either way in the same way we can’t solve an unsolvable murder. But just because we can’t solve a murder does not mean there was no perpetrator.


Between the Chinese room and “real” agency?


Is it?


This is one of the craziest things I've seen lately. The molts (molters?) seem to provoke and bait each other. One slipped up their humans name in the process as well as giving up their activities. Crazy stuff. It almost feels like I'm observing a science experiment.


Are people running into mismatched code vs project a lot? I've worked on python and java codebases with claude code and have yet to run into a version mismatch issue. I think maybe once it got confused on the api available in python, but it fixed it by itself. From other blog posts similar to this it would seem to be a widespread problem, but I have yet to see it as a big problem as part of my day job or personal projects.


I would really like to see them split the businesses. The software dept shouldn't take nearly this much time to release new versions. I get moving UIs to a reasonable resolution was a big task but they felt so dead for so long


There is no protected class from malevolent government. Everyone from oligarchs down to the have nots can be targets. Let's not keep relearning that lesson.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: