"OneLang is the love child of @koczkatamas and it was not a planned child. ....
OneLang is six months old at the time of writing and it already speaks, but don't expect any comfortable conversation with it yet. It cannot grow without a loving family, and as a single dad I cannot take care of it alone. It needs more mommies and daddies who can help raise it up."
indeed, I like your project. Negativity of the community can be discouraging. I stopped a project of mine because of a combination of the negativity and from the reality of having to hiring and train people to use my language.
/r/programming is one of the most pedantic forum I have ever seen but I also see it as a place where programmers flee and shelter from the non-technical bullshit and vent a bit.
If you submit anything there, be prepared for harsh criticism. There is some real value in there, but encouragement and cheerings won't come from there.
My experience is that there is a lot of toxicity on the internet, but also outside of it. I'm disappointed by how toxic, money-obsessed, and ignorant many people are. On the internet, all that is concentrated and delivered straight to your face.
I would recommend presenting projects first in person to people before putting them on the internet for debate.
Imagine how it must be for the people behind Rust. Yet, people from the team regularly show up, are polite and nice and are open to arguments in spite of all the negativity they surely face. I think it is easy to become bitter, suspicious, and unfriendly when faced with social pressure, but they seem to continuously find the arguments in even not so polite comments and patiently give good insights and own arguments.
I intend to write about this, and this is a reason I am keeping some of my personal projects less open source and invite very few people in that I can mentor.
I think it is a shame that the default tends to be negative comments rather than constructive, but I also recognized that giving into toxic emotions is easy.
At least in US you get the medical treatment first and then they hand you a large bill to pay. In poor countries the hospitals will turn you away until you pay a significant sum in advance (not exaggerating it has happened to me).
> At least in US you get the medical treatment first and then they hand you a large bill to pay.
A large bill which, if you're uninsured, you can almost always negotiate down to 10% or less of the original.
Of course, most people don't know this, but those large bills aren't what the hospitals expect uninsured patients to pay. They just legally have to present them the same initial bill that they present private insurers.
> How does one do this? Where do you learn it? Is there a book you suggest? The fact that I'm even asking this feel weird (I'm insured).
You can't do this if you're insured, because then the terms of your insurance apply. You can still get bills reduced, but the reasons are different and it's a bit more involved.
If you're uninsured, it's simple. You literally just tell them, "I have no insurance. I can't afford $45,000. It would take me years to pay that, and I'd probably default on the bill beforehand. However, if you reduce the billed amount to $500, I can pay that in full today, in cash.".
Substitute appropriate values in as needed, but that's the general idea. It's actually not all that different from what private insurers do, except they do all this up-front in bulk, so their rates are set in long-term contracts.
I don't disagree with the general message that these things are negotiable, but I'd love to see a citation showing real research on the effective rate. 10% seems way too low from my limited experience.
I've known people to successfully negotiate to 40-50% of original bill, usually with proof of (lack of) assets.
Maybe if you really are basically broke, they'll write you off rather than carry it on their books until they sell the debt. On the other hand if your bill is 45,000 and you have even meager assets : say a couple of cars and equity in a house, I'm guessing their going to try hard to see a good chunk of that.
There are businesses that are medical bill negotiators and charge you a percentage of the bill.
In general, they only negotiate hospital bills because they are the only bills large enough. I would say that the typical final negotiated rate they get from the hospital is about 3-20% of the billed amount. It depends on how high the original bill is, and it also depends on whether you need to make payments and how long the series of payments is.
Hospitals will certainly claim that you need to send in the proof of assets, usually you have to refuse about 6 or 7 times and they will relent.
However, things have changed in the last few years and professional medical bill negotiators have told me certain hospitals are completely unreasonable and refuse to negotiate. They advise these people to file bankruptcy.
You claim a 90% reduction is possible, then your example is a 99% reduction?
You're wrong either way. I've seen some bills my insurer pays around 2% of what is billed, but not most things. Hospitals will ofter sue, and they are aggressive about judgements. If you can pay something, they will take more.
Have you ever done this? Where did you hear this? Where have you seen it?
I have never had health insurance. Where I live many people don't have health insurance. I have never heard of this happening. I've seen peoples, my own included, wages garnished before this will happen. I currently have a $20k bill for an emergency appendectomy I had 4 weeks ago. The hospital will seriously take payments for 30 years before they'll lower any cost. If you want to negotiate, you'll have to wait until the collection agency has their account removed from your credit report 7 years after the first reporting. Any time before that you are in no position to negotiate with anybody.
EDIT: Unless your income is less than 1.5x the poverty level. In which case you qualify for aid in paying your bills.
Not the op, but I have done this on behalf of friends. Some with significant assets. Did you admit to having assets or significant income? If so, it might be very difficult to negotiate. Google for medical bill negotiation services or "lower my hospital bill" and you should be able to find some professionals near you. The consultation is always free. Be aware that some hospitals have become completely unreasonable in the last few years and would rather you file bankruptcy and collect nothing than negotiate. The initial consult with the negotiation service is always free and they will tell you if this is the case.
I think you make a good point, downvotes notwithstanding. A "market society" inherently rewards people who are good at "the game." Which is fine for most things: worst case scenario you pay too much for a shit car.
But having to play that damn game when you life is on the line is inhumane. There's no time out zone.
Yeah, it's wonderful how you can make it in such a system. Just imagine - a self-employed blue-collar worker slips with his car on a wet road. He loses his wife, his unborn child and his leg. He sells his house to pay the bills of the hospital and the mortician. His parents also pay some bills because he still had not enough. And then after a year or so on the street somebody tells him how negotiable these bills were. The American dream...
I hate negotiating for shit where my own identity is economically irrelevant. I suck at it, so if I go and buy a car I'm basically subsidizing people that are better at haggling.
That depends on if they are willing to negotiate with you before considering it a debt. If they send you to receivables with a 100k bill and you negotiate down to 10k cash, they are well within their rights to write off the 90k as debt forgiven. If they do so, you will be taxed on it.
Good luck finding a 90% off coupon for a surgery prior to the event.
It happened to a friend of mine who was hiking in Canada a year or two ago. Her son cut a big gash in his foot and they couldn't get online, so I had to call around to find an emergency room they could go to. The local emergency room basically said in lieu of proof of (internationally-accepted) insurance they would need $800 up front if he wanted to be seen. I think they wrapped a towel around it and drove back to the US.
Well as a general rule when you're travelling it' safer to buy some short term insurance, not really sure how it works in US. To some extent you cannot blame country for not taking care for foreign citizen for free. On the other hand I had medical emergency in Italy while back, and public hospital made several pretty expensive tests for free without even checking my documents. One of them (if this page is true) seems to be almost $1500: https://www.mdsave.com/procedures/echocardiography-complete-...
I know France has an budget line for those cases where they probably won't be paid, hospitals bill the State from this special fund for people who wouldn't be able to afford it. As far I know, it's just a few millions euros per year (of 145 billions tax income).
It should be noted that the bill won't be different from an insured person bill, the prices are "posted".
World Nomads offers a good product (https://www.worldnomads.com/) that I generally travel with but some travel credit cards also have pretty good medical benefits as well.
Did you have a European Health Insurance Card? This is the card that lets EEA citizens get state healthcare in other EEA countries and Switzerland at a reduced cost or sometimes for free.
Her husband's a developer at Microsoft, so they had good coverage. IIRC, they just weren't carrying the special paper you're supposed to print out to tell foreign hospitals that you're covered.
As a Canadian, I find that difficult to believe. Even more difficult to believe that your friend didn't get travel health insurance and carry proof of it while hiking. That's pretty reckless.
Do you really find it harder to believe a tourist wouldn't have travel health insurance? I've never heard of anyone buying that for a day trip to Canada. And just generally it's rare in my experience for people to buy insurance unless it's required in some way. Maybe that is an American phenomenon though.
By contrast, I know few Canadians who would set foot in the USA for one day without travel health insurance. We've all heard the story about the Canadian couple who went to Hawaii on their honeymoon and delivered a baby (prematurely) there, and it cost them 1 million in hospital fees because their coverage wasn't sufficient. And they did have insurance, it just didn't cover baby deliveries.
It sounds like it was the Canadian insurance provider who screwed them, though. They said[2] that since she had a bladder infection prior to getting the travel insurance, it was a pre-existing condition and therefore wasn't covered. So basically, if you get your travel insurance and come across the border, don't expect it to cover anything like a heart attack, an abcessed tooth, a prescription refill, etc.
> As a Canadian, I find that difficult to believe.
As someone who lived in Canada for 10 years, I can understand that. The blindness Canadians have to the severe problems in their own healthcare system is amazing. Take a look at the massive problems in autism care in Canada. Let me put it this way, it was cheaper (free), faster, and superior in every way in the US as opposed to Canada, where it was far more expensive, years in waiting times, and in the end got no autism assistance. To be fair, this was back in 2011 when we finally left, but having kept an eye on the system (what with having family there still), it hasn't really improved.
As a Canadian, I find it easy to believe. Go and ask some of the hospitals just across the border from Detroit. They have gotten bent over many times by Americans who come over to Windsor, get injured (usually related to the lower drinking age), show up in the ER, then bail when it comes time for the bill.
> At least in US you get the medical treatment first and then they hand you a large bill to pay. In poor countries the hospitals will turn you away until you pay a significant sum in advance (not exaggerating it has happened to me).
To complete the picture, in the truly civilized countries when you're sick you just go to the hospital, and they take care of you, no strings attached.
The whole world is not made just of the USA and some banana republics.
> At least in US you get the medical treatment first and then they hand you a large bill to pay
This as a legal mandate applies to emergency stabilization (including assessment as to need for same) only. It may happen with other things, but that varies a lot and is mostly a matter of what the particular provider finds most convenient.
"You will be asked to make a pre-service deposit of at least $750.00USD. If prescheduled services are estimated to exceed this amount, an additional deposit may be requested. The pre-service deposit can be made in the following ways: major credit card, wire transfer, check (we accept checks from any US bank in US dollars) or by cash. Please know your total and daily credit card limits."
Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale AZ, November 2017.
edit: I'm a bit off topic, that was for an appointment, not ER.
Yea, this seems like crappy gimmick. The fact people throw money at crap like this. The fact they got 25 million dollars too... One developer probably could build this...
For a decade or so the situation seemed to be that there were dozens of FOSS editors, all of which claimed to work perfectly but none of which was usable in reality. Blender was the first thing I found that actually worked properly. Having found something that works I'm a bit reluctant to return to the historically infuriating task of evaluating FOSS video editors, but maybe it's time to check out some of the other options again.
Same here, except I gave up on video editing all together because all of the FOSS video editors I tried were trash (I don't use that word lightly but they really were -- completely unusable). Never tried video editing with Blender, have only used it for 3D modeling and rendering.
kdenlive is the only FOSS competitor you can actually use, but I would not recommend it if you are happy with your blender setup, it's not that much better.
There are some closed source options out there like Lightworks that are decent.
After trying out multiple different video editors for simple editing on linux, I've ended up sticking to Blender. There's just no beating the fluidity with which you can throw video and audio channels around, group them, apply effects to groups, etc. It probably helps that I taught myself how to 3d model in blender so I was familiar with the shortcuts: Like every other feature of blender, it has a steep learning curve.
Chances are, LibreOffice is more than sufficient for the layperson. Even if the feature disparity was that of GIMP and Photoshop, 99% of the professional features would be left unused by the average person.
Saving CSV files. In Excel you have to do a bunch of tricks to get quotes around certain fields in the exported CSV (I end up using a custom field format to force quotes, then doing a find and replace in a text editor, as Excel likes to save "Text" as """Text"""), whereas in LibreOffice Calc there's an option to 'Quote all text cells' when exporting the CSV, which is much simpler.
Also importing CSV files works much better. I don't know how many times I had to suggest friends or customers to use openoffice for that, it was just easier than finding the right way to do it in Office.
