Poetically GPT-1 was the more compelling answer for every question. Just more enjoyable and stimulating to read. Far more enjoyable than the GPT-4/5 wall of bulletpoints, anyway.
Well, there's also cultural reasons. If the government of Japan entrusts you to self regulate on the basis of open access and no restrictions a Japanese business will understand the weight of expectations that have been placed on them.
A US telco would pop the champagne and then plan how best to screw their customers, safe in the knowledge that they have few competitors after they got local governments to ban municipal broadband.
And nowadays unless you professionally shooting photos for a billboard, bedroom poster or newspaper advert - that is clearly enough. 99%+ of photo viewing is done on a phone or tablet screen.
Even looking at the photos on the web page, I do see some differences, but both look fine to me. I'd love an A/B version where I can overlay the two photos and click back-and-forth quickly. But then if I need to do that to spot the differences, maybe it doesn't matter?
If my phone photos did bother me, I would turn on RAW mode and do the processing myself.
My "real" camera is a 15 year old Canon Rebel XSi. It's big and can't do a lot of the things my iPhone can and the photos are about the same quality (which is impressive because the Rebel is only 12 megapixels).
reply