"The nonoccurence of concurrence with low probability between events where there is a causal link."
- So, if A then B with a chance close to zero? A happened but B is not happening because the probability is low ...
"The nonoccurence of highly improbable concurrence between events where there is a causal link" ... same as above
"The nonoccurence of highly probable concurrence between events where there is a causal link" ... this one breaks probability.
- If A, then B with a chance close to or exactly 100% but B is not happening. ( it works on my machine and you have the same machine )
"The occurrence of highly probable concurrence between events where there is a causal link."
"The occurrence of highly probable concurrence between events where there is no causal link."
- The last two is just reality, since there either is a causal link or there isn't. (But) stuff is happening (anyways).
I'm wrong about concurrence being the inverse of coincidence, am I not? The only other thing that comes to mind would be scripted events. ( or destiny ... or black swans / self full-filling prophecies aka stuff that people work towards )
Well, Draghi et al are not the only reason(s) why Europe refused IT independence. It's simply how the Germans and German immigrants raised their children in the past 20+ years, so it's all a lot of talk for TV and the radio and to elevate the US even more so that talent moves to work for and/or in the US.
German leaders deliberately slowed innovation to make more money in the short-term ( oh wow, whaaaat? ) and capitalise on the data-hungry US economy whose people and last remaining noble characters have much less respect for privacy and security than their European counterparts.
All that is a great opportunity for journalists and buffs to investigate these European leaders cooperative networks, which are all tied tight in the US.
There is no room for Doomerism or hopeless talks. The path is clear and almost entirely disconnected from anything Europeans "have not" done or "have done" to end up in their position, which is also totally fine because there is no European or even German thinking or economic identity, not in the cities, not in villages [ exceptions exist of course ] and that's all because even educated voters have not realised who blinded them and how [ von der Leyen is just one boring example ] ...
30 years of making lots of money and despite great opportunity, this entire area hasn't changed one bit and the cognitive decline or rather lack of 'evolution' is brutal, which can be said about many places, of course, but it's almost shocking that it happened to the Germans.
So all in all, foreign money, lower supply chain quality, an even lower product quality, less privacy and security, lower educational levels in all generations and a cultural demise accelerated by The Rights deliberately misdirected focus ( kindly supported by the liberals and conservatives ) will open the continent up for all the ways that made America what it is now.
We are already seeing an increase in heavy drug use, more and more teens end up in psychiatric institutions and are fed meds that slow down their brains and organs. Hospitals are closing because no German with money cares about anything "German" or their "Heimat".
Meanwhile the US Military is increasing presence and infrastructure and we are all quite happy that they do. Something happened to the German population ( including immigrants ) and there's no reason to believe that the German or European rich will ever want to compete with the US anywhere. They compare themselves only to the bottom, only to whats below or behind them, it's funny.
They are perfectly fine winning against those with less opportunity/resources, even if that puts them far behind their actual competitors in terms of competence, business sense, strategy, and grandeur and beauty of their orbit/ sphere of control ( German: "Machtbereich" ).
So just spare peoples minds with nonsensical talk about
> European hyperscaler for cloud computing or
> Europe needs to give up trying to create a new Apple or Google and just focus on using the innovations generated by the IT revolution such as LLM's to just leapfrog into future industries and Green technologies.
But ... but, but ... Celestial alignment, the solar glare zone, opposition and conjunction events, galactic dust, nebulae, gravitational lensing, and various other dead angles, even from webb et al make the whole dark mattergy variable a bit too fantastical to calculate probabilities of life in the 'multi'verse, no?
Don't we 'use' dark matter to make observed patterns fit liminal explanations like when I blame multiple electronic devices of different age dying/breaking on the same day on solar flares?
Dog, get a dog. Then, train the two of you well & go outside and let the dog play cupid for friendships and neighbourly bonds. Other people share a lot of your hatred, anger, depression as well as the deliberate positivity, compartmentalisation and even hypocrisy that we use to cope with all the fun we don't and do have in life. But you have to be direct and radically honest. You can't be fooled, anyway, you read those books. And what do you have to lose?
You just can't release your creation into the wild aka 'don't get caught'.
Worked at a "customer support" once and got peculiar about the strange audio interface they used. Turns out they recorded every support agent while all incoming calls were fake and the callers mood and words aimed at evoking emotional responses from the support agents.
Germany, all big telcos involved and even a huge advertiser. Big teeth, strong bite. Years prior a big shot lawyer tried to get them for something else. Had hard evidence (proof). He settled of course, which was a bit off-character for that guy but if you kept digging, you'd find the classic scheme with big financial institutions and even intelligence agencies involved.
They needed a good cause, of course, so rehabilitation & reintegration of youthful offenders as well as ADHD types in therapy (yes, such institutions were directly involved as well) and other 'not yet lost causes' were 'hired' and got paid quite well to get them hooked on monetary reward mechanisms for upselling while 'helping people who are seeking support', so one would naturally be inclined to say that it wasn't bad at all but the opposite, actually; and I would absolutely agree if I didn't think that the vision and leadership of high status people over an obedient FUBU mob through the coming hard times wasn't complete trash.
Especially while these soooo complex relationships in the middle east and in the 'defected' viking gene pools are creating "strong people" in the hard times and conditions in war zones who then emigrate to do anything at all cost in the countries they arrive in, feeding Mafia and gangs, lowering supply chain and product quality (aided by governments), increasing exposure to drugs and lowest-end-behaviours and language (think music, film, club culture) and on and on the list goes on ...
But hey, 'the candy man' was/is a thing, too. Natural selection, I guess, hahahaha.
Addendum: any productive, constructive people, especially 'good' ones who immigrate with bunches of bad and 'ugly' are worth the risk of increased negative social impact. The Social Body can handle it.
It's necessary to create counter-measures tho, because legal or illegal barely matters if it serves a big and influential enough interest-group, which nobody can be blamed for but if you don't get caught "nailing" some shady stuff to a wall, you're fine.
And it's never about 'then the next guy will take his place'. It's a cute bullshit narrative but not how balance and active balancing work.
"The banana equivalent to Covid-19 is spreading to new countries, forcing the industry to change how the world’s most widely eaten fruit is farmed and even how it could taste." []
This is a bad comparison given that in that case the disease would only kill a very small percentage - less than 2% - of the population and mostly affect the older and weaker plants after which the rest of the population would develop immunity against the fungus. If this were the case it would not matter at all and we'd be eating Cavendish bananas for a very long time yet. That is not what this fungus does, it has the potential to devastate crops without any significant chance of the development of natural immunity.
It's a bad comparison but what you say is only true if you look at direct deaths - youth doesn't really protect against long covid, and the increase in cardiovascular risks in fact seems to disproportionately affect younger people.
- So, if A then B with a chance close to zero? A happened but B is not happening because the probability is low ...
"The nonoccurence of highly improbable concurrence between events where there is a causal link" ... same as above
"The nonoccurence of highly probable concurrence between events where there is a causal link" ... this one breaks probability.
- If A, then B with a chance close to or exactly 100% but B is not happening. ( it works on my machine and you have the same machine )
"The occurrence of highly probable concurrence between events where there is a causal link."
"The occurrence of highly probable concurrence between events where there is no causal link."
- The last two is just reality, since there either is a causal link or there isn't. (But) stuff is happening (anyways).
I'm wrong about concurrence being the inverse of coincidence, am I not? The only other thing that comes to mind would be scripted events. ( or destiny ... or black swans / self full-filling prophecies aka stuff that people work towards )