Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | phillnom's comments login

You admittedly would have 0 idea if any instances of racism were pointed to since you turned it off after a minute due to a single phrase that's exited for a long time being used.


To quote Dennis Reynolds, it hasn't even begun to peak.


Manjaro w/ KDE was my daily driver OS for several years before I switched to EndeavourOS w/ KDE a few months ago. The only major difference between the two that makes EndeavourOS more "terminal centric" is that you have to use the CLIs pacman and yay for installing packages, as Pamac the GUI package manager is something Manjaro provides. That said, I highly recommend making the switch and think with some small adjustments, you'll feel right at home.


CLI-centric does not sound great for an HTPC, though. I think Manjaro is not bad choice for hassle free TV computers with modern hardware. It has much better hardware support than Ubuntu out of the box. Updates rarely break something other than Gnome (I find anything else incredibly hard to use on a TV) extensions. It does not get in the way and it rarely needs my attention.

Yeah, it's a easy use. That's a major plus in my book. I really don't want to babysit my appliances.


Forbidden West is the sequel that came out in February. From "it was brutal even after just finishing ZD", it sounds you're mixing it up with The Frozen Wilds DLC that came out for Zero Dawn.


Yup, 100% got them mixed up.


This is what I use on Manjaro and it works well.


Title should be "70% of unregulated crypto exchanges..."


No, regulated at as well it seems, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29279380

Edit: sorry, misunderstood parent comment.


It’s in the summary:

> We quantify the wash trading on each unregulated exchange, which averaged over 70% of the reported volume.


That's just the list of exchanges, wherein Coinbase is listed as a regulated exchange. Compare that with the text of the abstract:

> We quantify the wash trading on each unregulated exchange, which averaged over 70% of the reported volume.

See how the 70% figure applies strictly to the unregulated exchanges?


Weird how in your scenario only people riding bikes need food.


Now that's deliberately being dense. Riding a bike means you'll eat more to fuel that effort.


Title would be more accurate if it said something like "Gitlab: Business Operations - Tech Stack". I was confused for a moment why stuff like Rails and Vue.js weren't mentioned until I realized it's strictly about Business Operations.


Yep, maybe the mods can change the title to reflect that this is the software GitLab the company uses.

This was probably submitted to Hacker News after someone saw my tweet https://mobile.twitter.com/sytses/status/1319325053217992704 which has some questions and answers in the replies.

John already linked to the architecture of GitLab the application in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24869339 in case you are interested in that.

Happy to answer any questions about either.


This might be of interest to you - https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/architecture


In the IT/Tech DD world, we call this "Back Office" vs "Customer Facing".

Some of these applications appear to span both.


> "Back Office"

Interesting, I thought "back office" was a super-set including both those (ie. CRM-y) tools and coded backend logic when a user makes a requests.


Most customers don't actually interact with CRM-y tools (usually). There might be integrations to (revenue cycle management for example) from customer facing to back-office, but that's usually the delineation.

But to your point, there's some grey area here.


I think you're confusing it with backend. Generally in traditional businesses you have reception/front desk where the customer interacts with the business and the back office where all the employees are doing various work.


Do you let the customers enter the back office in real life :-)


Ok, changed. Thanks!


Thank you!


They mention AWS, Azure, Cloudflare and DigitalOcean so I don't think that's strictly true.


They're paying money to (or have a formal business relationship with) those cloud providers, so it makes more sense.


There isn't just one type of oppression, so saying stuff like "actual" oppression does nothing but to disparage other types of oppression.


Delivery is just something that's FAR more efficient in the markets

Why then do private companies like UPS and FedEx rely on USPS for deliveries to rural areas?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: