Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nickjackson's comments login

There is a daily mail video of a drone at the North Terminal Bus station. DM is hardly a good source, and I was sceptical at first but I'm 95% sure its the right location. The question is now, is the footage fake and is it from last week.



This is super sweet.

It would be great to tie this into a release pipeline, where the release process is actively keeping an eye on failure rates of that service, so that bad deploys could be halted or rolled back automatically.

I was thinking this could work really well when using production integration tests. A percentage of that traffic can be dynamically routed to the newly running services, allowing the release pipeline to ensure the service is functioning correctly before routing any real users.


Yep. TalkTalk can't even keep their customers key details secure, and now they are expected to keep browser history as well? It's a joke.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/talktalk-fin...



This is the only sane way.


Until for some reason a user really needs to use a classic UUCP bang-path. Poor help!trapped!in!lost!server ;)


yes. `eval $(minikube docker-env)` will setup the docker cli to use minikube's docker demon.

https://kubernetes.io/docs/getting-started-guides/minikube/#...


I for one would love to see a hosted offering of cockroachdb!


I've been looking into this a bit, but put off by the fact that EU VAT for digital products isnt really being enforced upon US companies, so not sure there is much of a market for it. Also, as a brit I'm not sure how brexit might screw up the business model.


I really don't think there is any excuse for it this day and age especially when building sites from scratch. There are so many different techniques and technologies for doing zero downtime deploys, not to mention the numerous PaaS that will do it out of the box if you dont know how.


There's still cost to it. It basically boils down to: do you lose more money during a manual maintenance period, or by hiring extra people to do all changes in zero-downtime style. (Or doing slower development with the existing team) The technology for transparent changes has been available for decades, although it's true - it's much easier to use today. But it still needs extra work. And someone has to pay for that work in the end.



Would it not make sense for broadband router manufacturers to step up here, especially ISPs who provide routers to customers.

First of all, IoT devices really need to be connected on isolated vlans with very strictly controlled WAN capabilities. Obviously this already exists, but not in the fashion a layman, who wants to put their fridge on the wifi will understand. The average home routers need cleaner interfaces and clearer abstractions rather than the cruft that exists now.

Does your fridge really need to access the internet, and if it does, perhaps you could setup your router to only allow access at certain times, to a single host and with circuit breaker protections in case traffic has a signature that matches that of a DDoS attack. This circuit breaker pattern could be extended to all traffic running through the router, and provide the user with reports of potential infected devices and traffic hungry users.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: