This is what the western owners of the narratives want everybody to believe. In reality, the west is much more repressive toward citizens that disagree with the narrative and manifest it publicly. The European Commission, which in practices rules over the EU, is a completely unelected body. Still, Europeans think they live in a free country. Just like the Americas think they live in the greatest country on the planet. Yet, many run away from it as soon as the remote work allows them to. Again, just like Putin said, the West is an empire of lies.
Well, they did go after a foreign company. Probably a competitor of a US company. Do they enforce the same way against US companies? Perhaps it’s just a tool to beat foreign competition. Eg the case being built against TikTok. Perhaps the EU should investigate the same US companies. But I think the European Commission is in the pockets of Washington.
You criminal. You knowingly support copyright infringement. You represent what is wrong with the world. I hope they put your dumb face on toilet paper in China and force you to go around file DMCA claims to take it down.
Posting like this will get you banned on HN, as it's completely against the rules. You've unfortunately been breaking them in other comments too. Could you please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and use the site as intended from now on? That means (among other things) no personal attacks, no name-calling, no flamewar, and so on. We want respectful, thoughtful, and above all curious conversation.
It’s nice when they put it like that. Now imagine you trying to relax or concentrate in your home and hearing a “car door closing”, every minute, regularly, all day. And if in the end it sounds more like the car’s tire blowing up - well… “we are looking at ways to resolve the issue”, “we are aware of the issue and working on it”, “you are the only one complaining”, “it looks you may be too sensitive to noise”, and so on. Who cares in the end. It’s just people.
Doesn’t matter. It’s a cultural thing. Mexico can get as young as they like. Won’t matter. Look at the work culture in China vs Mexico. That’s where all the answers lie.
Exactly my point about Ukraine. I don’t understand the moral indignation with the attack. Just like you are saying. Russia is big enough to get away with it and so does it. Agree?
That's a silly argument. There are many jobs at which being smart is an advantage. IQ tests correlate fairly well with being smart. Giving an IQ test could then give you a group of people that are more likely to be smart than the initial interviewing population. Assuming the job is not "taking IQ tests" is the assessment unjustified?
As much as I hate the current interview process, this isn't true.
The justification foe the assessment is that the assessment is the defined set of hoops that the company who you are trying to get paid by has assigned.
When presented with a problem she not only found a solution, but shared that solution with her peers. And has been promoted at her jobsite. As far as I can see, the interview properly assessed her abilities and found her qualified for the job.
In short, the interview process worked as intended.
“Russia has unleashed senseless destruction and genocidal violence on Ukraine in an attempt to reoccupy the former colony”. It’s not senseless since they have explained the reasons at length, albeit their adversaries refused to listen. And it’s not genocidal either since the goal is not to exterminate Ukrainian people. The goal is to prevent a NATO giant air carrier on its borders. The war will continue until those that don’t want to listen will start listening. Perhaps war must come to their countries for them to do so.
> The goal is to prevent a NATO giant air carrier on its borders.
If their goal is to prevent Germany, Poland, Norway, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Alaska from existing and being (part of, in the last case) NATO members, well, invading Ukraine seems a rather improbable route to achieving that.
All they’ve managed so far is to make that worse by adding Finland to the mix, and increasing NATO deployments to the existing eastern flank members, and increasing defense expenditures across NATO.
> It’s not senseless since they have explained the reasons at length, albeit their adversaries refused to listen.
Ah yes the Russians are telling the truth this time guys, I promise, they are totally not lying about why they are invading Ukraine.
> The goal is to prevent a NATO giant air carrier on its borders.
Finland joining NATO kinda makes this a reality no?.
> The war will continue until those that don’t want to listen will start listening.
This 3 day war has already lasted over a year, and with losses so high by Russia that they are fielding T62's against Ukraine.
I don't think Russia can afford to wage this war for many more years, unless they start fielding those parade T34's but I don't think that will go so well.
Also why should anyone listen to Russia? there border with NATO just increased massively, and yet I don't see them doing anything about that.
> Perhaps war must come to their countries for them to do so.
Perhaps Russia should focus on trying to capture a city thats 250KM from their border before they threaten countries they aren't literally on their doorstep with war.
> "Much of the Russian military has not been affected negatively by this conflict" [1]
That's not even what he says, quote it properly.
"Much of the Russian military has not be been affected negatively by this conflict, one of those forces is their undersea forces".
Which is 100% true, they haven't lost a single submarine in this entire conflict.
Im not sure what your point is, is it that Russias military is so corrupted and rotting that they have to use T62's without even having significant losses?.
Because we have pictures and videos of Russians losing at least 1190 tanks in this conflict alone.
> What are the Ukrainian losses by the way? Is it above 300k already, as claimed by one of the presidential candidates? [1]
Your appeal to authority is noted and quite admirable but I don't think Robert Kennedy Junior has better estimates than the American intelligence community.
The American intelligence leaks the other week put the losses as.
Russia - 35.5k-43.5k KIA
Ukraine - 16k-17.5k KIA
significant losses for both countries, but no where near the meth induced fever dream of 300k.
> Which is 100% true, they haven't lost a single submarine in this entire conflict.
You're deliberately omitting the fact that he says "Much of the Russian military" and "one of those" in a single sentence and presume that he only speaks about submarines, whereas much of the military is still much of it, including submarines.
> The American intelligence leaks the other week put the losses as.
What period of time are these numbers for?
> Im not sure what your point is, is it that Russias military is so corrupted and rotting that they have to use T62's without even having significant losses?.
The mentioned leak data also suggest Ukraine would likely exhaust their air defense systems by the end of May [1]. Do you trust this intelligence estimate as well as the KIA numbers?
> You're deliberately omitting the fact that he says "Much of the Russian military" and "one of those" in a single sentence and presume that he only speaks about submarines, whereas much of the military is still much of it, including submarines.
Parts of it are fine, the Air Forces are likely fine too.
But the ground forces has been completely destroyed they have lost some many vehicles, including tanks that they have started using tanks that they don't even produce anymore.
I like how you never answered my question of why Russia is using T62's if its ground forces aren't being devastated?.
> What period of time are these numbers for?
Upto march this year, as it says on the document if you read it.
> The mentioned leak data also suggest Ukraine would likely exhaust their air defense systems by the end of May [1]. Do you trust this intelligence estimate as well as the KIA numbers?
Yes, which is why the west needed to and has been focusing on supplying Ukraine with air defence, which they have been doing.
> Parts of it are fine, the Air Forces are likely fine too.
He didn't say parts of it, he said much of their military.
> But the ground forces has been completely destroyed
You've mentioned 35.5k-43.5k KIA losses for Russia up to March this year. Are you suggesting that these numbers comprise the complete ground forces?
> I like how you never answered my question of why Russia is using T62's if its ground forces aren't being devastated?.
I thought that was a loaded question you weren't expecting answers for. Is there anything in T62 that make it, in your opinion, unworthy on the battlefield? It's another piece of useful artillery equipment after all. If the things you say are true and they no longer produce it, why not using the existing stockpile that had been taking space and maintenance effort at past peace time? Is it the only model of tanks they've been using since, well, the time you claim their ground forces were completely destroyed?
> I thought that was a loaded question you weren't expecting answers for. Is there anything in T62 that make it, in your opinion, unworthy on the battlefield? It's another piece of useful artillery equipment after all.
But it's not being used as artillery its being used as tank. Indirect fire its not a bad idea but as a tank its going to melt in the face of anything at or never then a T64.
> If the things you say are true and they no longer produce it, why not using the existing stockpile that had been taking space and maintenance effort at past peace time?
Well for one its crew is different to anything the Russian forces use now because it doesn't have a auto loader, its a cannon is too weak to really take on anything newer then it.
> Is that the only model of tanks they've been using since, well, the time you claim their ground forces were completely destroyed?
No but T55's have been spotted getting moved around so theres hope yet.
What really sucks is that members of society like you think that a government nitpicking on immigration laws to justify fascist harassment of a specific group of people is actually fine. Your belief are the real issue (for us as a society) because they reveal a deep seated hatred toward a specific group of people. And history shows where that leads.
Russian or Brexiteer? My opinions aren’t relevant as I was merely pointing out how countries typically view non-citizens. While it’s not nice or fair, citizens of countries viewed as hostile are often viewed with hostility. The wars of the 20th century pointed this out multiple times. Look at the Japanese in North America and the Germans in Eastern Europe. The Middle East isn’t exactly brimming with goodwill towards its various neighbours or even its own citizens and residents.
