Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more nadir_ishiguro's commentslogin

I was a bit surprised by that when I first learned that from a healthcare worker, but it's true.

I think this should be taken care of by the employer.


If you mean from the perspective of having to do it/pay for it, you can claim I think it's £6/week for it in the UK if you don't have the option of getting it done at work (but hospitals in general do I believe).


So should sane work hours and good pay but here we are.



One of the only sensible things pg ever wrote.


We might have different ideas of what "sensible" means.


Not familiar with how flagging works. Why would it be flagged?


when topics are too political usually flame wars abound and moderators can choose to flag/derank a submission to avoid the comments section going wild or just close comments altogether in extreme cases

all i can find on doing research is if a thread has more comments than upvotes that might be what flags it as flamewar candidate (but seems mostly is manually reviewed by moderators, not fully-automated) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39790881 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39231821


Is there a simple rule about how many "flags" vs "upvotes" lead to an article not appearing on the front page?


[flagged]


Or, just maybe, HN is full of people who don’t come to HN to read about nazis.


[flagged]


You get down votes, but this is exactly it.


Yeah, it's telling how this comment went from +2 to -2 to flagged to revived


You sound like Jordan Peterson.


Love matrix. Improving the onboarding is a great step. I've seen less technical people have issues in that area until now.

Mostly a desktop/web user myself, hoping all that Element X work will trickle down to us.


I'm sorry what? Skeptoid the podcast?

Edit: Yes. In 2014. How did I miss that? Used to listen to that podcast, though probably stopped before that.



I remember at the time being less than surprised at the charges. Dunning always felt a little off to me, even though I did enjoy his podcast.


I personally don't believe an archival storage, at least for personal use.

Data has to be living if it is to be kept alive, so keeping the data within reach, moving it to new media over time and keeping redundant copies seems like the best way to me.

Once things are put away, I fear the chances of recovering that data steadily reduce over time.


> Once things are put away, I fear the chances of recovering that data steadily reduce over time.

I’ve run into this a lot. You store a backup of some device without really thinking of it, then over time the backup gets migrated to another drive but the device it ran on is lost and can’t be replaced. I remember reading a post years ago where someone commented that you don’t need a better storage solution, you need fewer files in simpler formats. I never took his advice, but I think he might have been right.


I won't archive anything on portable media.

Cloud, or variants thereof, is fine -- I use rsync.net for backup and archive. But needing to manually run a backup (say, onto a thumb drive) is not sustainable, and even though the author suggests that disks (spinning rust or optical) might actually have a reasonable lifespan, I don't trust myself to be able to recover data from them if I want it.

As the author says, the limiting factor isn't technical. For media, it's economic. For any archival system it's also going to be social. There's a reason that organisations that really need to keep their archives have professional archivists, and it's not because it's easy :).


I'm from Germany and personally prefer Japanese fountain pens, but also value our local brands.

I took for granted that I could go into any small stationary store and buy a LAMY or Pelikan any time I wanted as a child.

"Also, a company in my country started making a paper which rivals Yu-Sari and Tomoe River. I write letters with it, and it's great."

Is that available internationally?


My first PhD advisor was German, and he introduced me to LAMY pens. Everyone in our lab was given a hardcover notebook and a LAMY pen, and there were plenty of ink cartridges that we could use. I don’t use fountain pens these days, preferring pencil instead, but I remember how nice those pens were.

While I’m on the topic of German stationery, I regularly use my Staedtler eraser and pencil sharpener.


I keep a stable of inked pens. The set is half Japanese, half German all the time. I find Lamy superior for leak resistance and ruggedness, and they're repairable if you manage to damage them also, their tipping is one of the best and fastest polishing/adapting ones if not the best. Japanese ones tend to stay at my desk at home, since they're more delicate writing instruments (except Pilot Metropolitan.That's a tank), but I enjoy them all the same, regardless of their price points and materials.

BTW, if you have not tried Montblanc's Royal Blue give it a chance. That one is "different". Also Scrikss's blue black ink is nice.

The notebook using this paper is called Meteksan Prestige [0]. I don't know if they're exported or not.

[0]: https://www.sarikalem.com/en/meteksan-prestij-bloknot-17x24-...


Notebook looks good, much less expensive than Rhodia or Yu-Sari for 300 sheets of A5, assuming paper quality is as advertised. Priced in dollars although I’m not sure if they actually ship to to the us.


Yeah I never came across those Japanese products given the available German brands, of which there's also Staedtler, Faber-Castell, Stabilo, and Rotring, in addition to those already mentioned.

If anything, I had thought Japan were known to produce fine markers/felt-tip pens.


Yes, because an actual A.I. would somehow be free of biases and magically tend towards justice somehow.


Like any actual intelligence.


Read his stuff years ago and it's so transparently ... stupid.

You really have to be blessed with the right kind of mix between psychopathy and idiocy to think that he's somebody to listen to.


Reading Yarvin, I get the impression that he has never seriously investigated and contemplated how both governments and corporations work. His ideas are very feels-oriented. He makes a lot of bizarre and invalid assertions about both regarding operations, inputs, and outputs. He seems to live in an ironically academic affluenza bubble that's quite divorced from reality.

He is a fairly deplorable contributor to political theory and an uninspiring writer who hasn't done anything useful in any of his endeavours as far as I an tell. Has Urbit ever done anything useful? How much money has gone into it, and how much of it was his? Wait, sorry Curtis; tell me again about the efficiency of private corporations.


> right kind of mix between psychopathy and idiocy

Affulenza is real. These guys are brain-damaged.


At least they only have all the money.


At least money is not power.


Or you just have to be the Vice President of the United States!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: