Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more morio's comments login

Sadly anything can be politicized these days.


These extreme fire events extend across the entire Northern hemisphere right now (Oregon, Washington, Montana, Greece, Turkey, Siberia etc.). Blaming California specific forest management practices is disingenuous at best.


They are mainly Federal lands and so it is mainly Federal policy and practice that would be to blame in the US for that aspect of the causes. But the most obvious international common denominator is hotter, drier, windier weather - although I would not be surprised if many countries have similar "modern" responses to forest fires.


Forest management is bad overall, who will pay for it? In US/Canada the heat dome made for extreme weather. In Europe, record heat and rainfall causing extreme floods. We're having both, bad mitigation and climate catastrophe, going on. Plus Covid, pretty much following Hopi prophecies.


How does the fires being common across the region absolve California of the accusation of mismanagement? Isn't that more damning?


Calling "the entire northern hemisphere" a "region" is a bit of a stretch; GP is presumably referring to the summer season (which is not shared by the southern hemisphere at this time), not proximity to California.


There are two problems that required to Solutions. Many of the areas that are burning now had a burn interval I'm less than 5 years prior to Federal wildfire suppression. They haven't burned in the last 150 years because of this. This is a real problem that needs to be addressed on top of climate change.


What kind of false positives are you seeing with gcc?

Personally I have never seen gcc spitting out a false positive. IMO it's always a good idea to explicitly downcast even if you know that it's 'safe'. That way someone else will see instantly what's going on. The fact that Rust requires it should tell us something.


For example, I've just reported this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537

You can find more cases in the bugtracker. To be fair, it seems many of them were fixed in recent releases.


The 1 and 0 are ints. It most likely complaints because the sign isn't same.


Huh? You just pointed out what capitalism is about.


Capitalism is about ownership of means of production. Look it up.


Unfortunately too many people are turning an economic term into a political term. But I do agree that we should all be polite here.


It's not possible to boil it down to just that. Also, please don't be snarky.


There are many failure points but one are the high voltage carrying power lines themselves.

As they reach their capacity they start to droop quite a bit, which in itself can cause issues like touching something they usually would not.

Because HV lines are made from aluminum they loose some of their strength as they are heated up. Above 100C or so the aluminum anneals which means strength is lost. Now you just need some wind shaking those lines and the whole thing breaks. If you have reached that point you likely have to replace the entire length of the HV line.

Of course the cold weather counters some of this. But only to a certain point.

If just one HV line fails you now have to deal with the cascading effect as the current is load balanced on the remaining HV lines.


Thanks for the link. Though as a Google employee you should probably refrain from any further public comments.


There's nothing wrong with a Google employee participating in a Google-related discussion (edit: I mean in an HN thread of course), same as with any company. It's nice if they say so, which jefftk did.

Edit: I misread. Corrected below. Sorry!


I'm pretty sure they mean it's a bad idea from Google's perspective, not Hacker News'


Oh, I think you're right. I'm too used to certain types of internet reflexes. Sorry GP!


I would edit your initial comment because to many it will read as if you understood it as Google’s perspective, and still Okayed


Ok, I did that. Thanks!


Nothing wrong with that, sure, but making comments related to ongoing antitrust litigation against company employing you, while not being any official spokesperson and not having your comments vetted by legal and PR, can be really, really detrimental to one's career if Google decides that it doesn't like your comments. Google is very explicit in its internal trainings to never make any public comments like that unless you're officially empowered to do so. You can say or write anything you want on HN... on the last day at your job.


I worked at Microsoft in Europe and we never had such training. Is this only in the US?


Yes, in the EU employees are more protected and it is much more limited what an employer are legally allowed to do. In fact they have to prove that your intention was malicious.


There's probably better protection against random terminations on average in Europe than in America.


Would whistleblower protections apply in this case?


No, why would they? He's not whistleblowing. The commenter even admits that he has no context on the link in question and just suspects it's what's being implicated.


I've been given formal warning for that, others have been fired. It made it front page of HN. I don't think that's wise advice in all cases dang.


Dan, that's like asking a Google employee to basically get themselves fired. It's not something we should encourage, for their own benefit.


Nothing wrong for HN, but definitely risky as an employee.


It seems possible that in the history of internet forums, some of them might occasionally receive subpoenas because forum members posted something essential to one side's case in some litigation. It also seems possible that some of those forums receiving subpoenas would rather not deal with the burden of responding.


Exactly, wouldn't want to lose those golden handcuffs :)


I agree 100% with this. I have a fairly large tinker shop with 20-30 different machines and initially bet on the Pi platform to do CNC/Octoprint/robotics/etc controls, thinking I should standardize. Most of the Pis failed with storage issues eventually; be it eMMC, microSD or USB flash drives. Since then I've moved on to x86 based industrial motherboards which ended up costing about the same when you include everything. Zero problems since then. And boot times are now measured in seconds, not minutes.


The site does not have a valid SSL certificate. Some browsers will block it.


Why does the author not just put it on github/gitlab/... instead of only offering a .zip? It's 2020 last time I checked.


Not everyone wants to work that way, and having a public git as a requirement is ridiculous. The software is FOSS, why are you complaining?


Never said it should be a requirement. But downloading a .zip file from a site which does not have a valid SSL certificate nor supports SSL in the first place does not instill confidence. Software security is a thing.


Agreed about the SSL/TLS, but the comment sounded more like not having a public git was the complaint.


If it's that onerous to download the zip, maybe we should build a tool to browse .zip/.tgz source links instead of pressuring everyone to centralize all source code on the planet into just two web sites.


Wait, what's the other one that isn't GitHub? Sounds like we need to start working on the people still putting their stuff there!


I develop hardware. At any given time I have 3 programmers, various charger cables, usb to serial cables, logic analyzers, a mouse, a spacemouse (for CAD), flash drives, 2 x label printer (strip and shipping) and various other stuff plugged into my 12 port hub. And I still have to switch them out due to lack of ports. And hubs don't play well with high speed USB3 based logic analyzers.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: