The first sentence made me expect Asimov's "The Feeling of Power", which--avoiding spoilers--regards the (over-)use of calculators by a society.
However, since I brought up calculators, I'd like to pre-emphasize something: They aren't analogous to today's LLMs. Most people don't offload their "what and why" executive decision-making to a calculator, calculators are orders of magnitude more trustworthy, and they don't emit plausible lies to cover their errors... Though that last does sound like another short-story premise.
When support needs are infrequent enough on the customer end, this effectively becomes a market for lemons--a customer can't know how good your support is until they've bought your product, and by then it's too late for them. People can advertise world-class customer support for one-time purchases because the few customers that encounter the awful support won't move the needle that much compared to shifting money from long term support teams to sales teams.
That being said, I realize this dynamic is likely much different for frequent/long-term buyers such as B2B solutions where quality support does translate to better retention and word-of-mouth advertising.
> All you have to do is hire customer support who is empowered, knowledgeable and actually cares
Those people you have to pay, because they can do well in other positions. But paying them contradicts the goal of minimizing cost.
I'm not saying there isn't an opportunity to invest in top notch customer service as a product differentiator, but it's probably a safer bet to have barely-existing support and lower the sticker price.
> it's probably a safer bet to have barely-existing support and lower the sticker price.
Depends on the product and the size of the company selling. Sure, in certain circumstances it makes sense to skimp on customer support. In others, it absolutely does not.
For instance, one of the reasons Amazon was so successful when introduced in Europe was its great customer support. Years earlier, IBM had similar success stories.
I've been at two different companies who also had support as a competitive differentiator. Both of them were bought, both had support stripped and outsourced and both are more profitable than they were.
Sadly, as much as we want to believe it, support does not seem to make enough market difference to justify the outlay.
It's not that support doesn't make a market difference, it's that customer loyalty is a liquidatable asset, and almost everyone wants to retire someday, so good companies almost inevitably will eventually become bad companies and cash out all the good will they've accrued over years and decades.
The only possible solution is some sort of regulation of transparency in ownership structured similarly to banking regulations (routinely moving amounts of money just under reporting limits or in any other way seeming to attempt to dodge scrutiny is considered malfeasance), so customers are promptly and continuously informed when Mom and Pop Shop is bought out by Established PE Vultures™ or Scrappy Small Business gets acquired by S&P #342, Enshitiffication Incorporated or a majority of Public Infrastructure Corporation is owned by Slacktivist Investors Group.
I want it to be obvious, and I want ownership to necessarily be as prominent as branding. "A Unilever Brand since 2003" needs to be just as big as "Natural Small Local Foods Coop Inc, since 1913," so that we can start to associate the corrosion of service and product quality with ownership and acquisition and corporate mandates, and any attempts to overly convolute the source of a clear business direction with scattered minority ownership just happening to band together needs to be treated as fraud.
And most of industry today—but especially the tech industry—is laser-focused on making sure they never actually have to compete on a level playing field with anyone.
This absolutely works, and was the key selling point for Rackspace when I worked there, "Fanatical Support". Unfortunately it got purchased by private equity and subsequently ruined, eliminated almost all US staff, and offshored everything to India, and this included a rebrand to remove Fanatiguy from the logo and the "Fanatical Support" promise.
While you /can/ make a premium offering with competent support as a competitive advantage, the most short-term profit to be made is then to buy that company after it's established a brand reputation and burn that brand reputation as fuel to produce extra profit until it becomes worthless and anyone who held your stock previously is left holding the bag.
That's a real shame to hear. Many years ago I took over the running of a website that was hosted on Rackspace, and their support really was great. We rarely had problems, but when things did go wrong they always resolved it really quickly.
that can work out in large scale b2b or expensive consumer goods... but in mass market goods? forget it. people vote with their wallet and only their wallet, as evidenced by the shiploads of (sometimes life-threateningly defective) crap Temu and Alibaba have flooded most Western countries with.
Based on Bill Gate's recommendation[0], I read the Vital Question a few years ago.
It tries to answer the important question of how life evolves from chemistry. I remember him spending a long time on the chemistry and location questions, but not on the time it took. Probably hard to do from the fossil record.
FusionAuth | Senior Security Engineer, Documentation Engineer, Sr Developer Advocate | Denver, CO, USA ONSITE/hybrid for the security engineer, others are Remote USA | Salaries listed on job req, but for the Security Engineer it is 140k-200k
Our mission is to make authentication and authorization simple and secure for every developer building web and mobile applications. We want devs to stop worrying about auth and focus on building something awesome. There are a lot of companies in the auth space, but we feel like we have something special:
* a unique deployment model (self-host on-prem or in your cloud or run in our cloud)
* A well designed API first approach; one customer compared our app to petrichor
* a mature product (the code base is over eight years old and we've found and fixed a lot of the sharp edges around core login use cases; however there are plenty more features to add)
* founder-led; the CTO is an engineer who still writes code
* a full featured free-as-in-beer version that makes the sales cycle easier; prospects often come in having prototyped an integration already
Our core software is commercial with a "free as in beer" version. We also open source much of our supporting infrastructure. We are profitable but raised money in 2023 to accelerate our growth (more on that here: https://fusionauth.io/blog/fusionauth-funding ).
Technologies and standards that you will work with: Modern Java, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Docker, Kubernetes, OAuth, SAML, OIDC.
Learn more, including about benefits and salaries, and apply here: https://fusionauth.io/careers/ ( Click/tap the 'View open positions' orange button. )
Oof. Is that true of the "who's hiring" posts here on HN?
reply