The opinion only shows how little, read none what so ever, experience some people have in figuring out compliant business processes. Yet another rude awakening for the, let me be blunt, cluelessly naive and in some cases outright criminal tech crowd that seems to flok in huge numbers around crypto in general.
That attitude started aroind the time Uber got big. Maybe even with AirBnB. In a sense, crypto is exactly the tech eco system we deserve. Good that there is finally some enforcement of rules that apply tp basically everyone else.
There's lots of laws that aren't "clear", but people don't phone the police up and ask them what they're going to do. They talk to a lawyer and get advice.
Was the most popular British-made small boat of all time, and some of them have successfully circumnavigated.
Sturdy thing with only 0.9m draft, able to ride into shallow waters and sit happily on its keels when the tide goes out, and surprisingly spacious for its length. Good boat.
I feel the same argument can be make about Tor. While it primary uses are probably illegal (doesn't necessary mean immoral) activity, it helps a lot free press in oppressed regimes (also illegal, but by western standards moral).
Any of the thousands of linux contributors has the every right to sue you if you are redistributing his code without his written permission (remember, GPL is invalid in law regards in SVK). I don't think it's very sane to trust the copyright holders' good mood to not sue you when you are infringing his copyrights - and yes, you are infringing it if you don't have his signed agreement, that's the law and no matter you write and call a license you cannot out-rule that.
In addition, corporations are owning part of that copyright too - if you look at software patents war, it clearly shows what tools are to be used against the competition.
