i think thats a fair point but there's a lot of benefit from from that. they're able to focus on making a great CMS
there are also some open source solutions that are great. Netlify CMS works really well for a very basic page / blog management solution
a lot of the headless CMS solutions also offer generous free tiers, making it perfect for web devs to spin up a free instance for their personal sites and projects
Keep in mind that many FOSS CMS's can also do headless. Drupal has very robust JSON:API support (as well as GraphQL through a contrib module), and WP has its own Rest API. Drupal also has a distribution specifically geared toward headless/decoupled: https://www.contentacms.org
There have always been headless CMS's, the flavor of CMS that really means "web CMS" has always been a single category of CMS.
What this article is really saying is that the web CMS is going away, leaving content CMS's with web API's as the king. What you're saying is that Web CMS's are morphing into content CMS's.
Which is great, but I don't really see the point of the article. None of this is really new.
1) People would (and do) cheat at mandatory breathalyzers.
2) It's not speeding that injures people, it's the speed differences that cause issues. Limiting a car to 70mph won't help when it's icy, and they should be driving 40mph.
3) How exactly would a car detect reckless driving? How would it know that it wasn't warranted (ie swerving to avoid a kid)?
> It's not speeding that injures people, it's the speed differences that cause issues.
When two car are at a speed of 70mph, the maximum speed difference between them is 140mph, when they are at 50mph, it's only 100mph. So the speed of a car has a direct impact on the speed difference between cars.
Reckless driving is rarely a single event but a behavior over time. I know a couple of folks that are pretty reckless, doing 35 through neighborhoods, tailgating, abrupt stops. Hell just monitoring brake rotor temperature is probably a pretty good indicator.
A lot of things are hard. Do we just give up because things are hard, or because we don't know how to do them yet?
We have created nuclear power plants, airplanes, giantic ships, giant dams, power grids, 2,700 foot skyscrapers, and so on. I think we can design a computer with sensors to detect unsafe driving conditions, and at least get a minimum level of operational safety.
I don't have all the answers for you. But there probably are answers, and they're probably not all that difficult, considering everything we've accomplished before. Maybe it's worth the tens of thousands of human lives to at least try, even if we don't know exactly how ahead of time.
With some reflection I don't think I was 100% ready. But I did at least make sure my finances were in order, I knew what it would do to our budget, and my wife and I had expectations set going in who would bear what responsibility. It sounds like the people in this article didn't think of that stuff. And I'm not sure I entirely blame them. We as a society make it a taboo to talk about anything but good stuff when it comes to parenting.
Yeah, I can't see them being worth that much money. Between WP and Drupal's Contenta distribution (http://www.contentacms.org/), you can deploy a free open source system that's way more extendable than a proprietary system ever will.
I don't agree with the decision. But, he was not ejected for S&M hobbies. He was ejected because he was perceived to believe that women are subservient to men (evidently this was part of some of his online writing).
Gor is a fiction community, as others had said before the Bible and other fiction books have similar views on women. Gor as all bdsm is a game, it is a play, an act between consenting adults.
Garfield has never (to our current knowledge) acted in real life upon the things said in the context of Gor.
