Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mercurysmessage's comments login

I don't see the need to say anything negative about trans people, it feels very similar to anti-gay rhetoric and talking points of the past. It's not contributing or helping, and actually causes a lot of harm.


There are legitimate discussions to be had about things like the rates of detransitioning teenagers and mental health in the trans community. But places like Reddit have made such discussion verboten.


Does that also include anything negative about a particular trans person?

Many for example consider unacceptable the inclusion of the word "transgender" in this article title (The Guardian of all places):

> Transgender prisoner who sexually assaulted inmates jailed for life

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/11/transgender-...


It was actually the Child Separation policy enacted by Trumps government that was meant to deter immigration. You're the only one operating on bad faith here.


Yes, it's long been known that it was a lie and excuse, it's sad that people on this site somehow aren't aware of this. Trump had two neo-nazis in his administration, this is just some of the fallout of that.


> Trump had two neo-nazis in his administration

Bold claim. Who? Proof?


I thought it was common knowledge by now?

Stephen Miller and Stephen Bannon.

Here's some info on Miller:

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2019/11/12/stephen-mille...

https://www.npr.org/2019/11/26/783047584/leaked-emails-fuel-...

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/white-supremacy-was-behi...

And on Bannon:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/09/steve-bannon-has-a-n...

https://observer.com/2019/05/steve-bannon-afd-party-germany/

Bannon wasn't there for the whole presidency, but he still did damage. Miller is the reason why child separation became a thing.


"Can someone explain why OP is being downvoted?"

Probably for implying that Trump wasn't that bad, when he clearly was.


So you don't use a monitor either?


This site is way too fickle


"When switching phones it's still a process of hours / days to get everything set-up the way you had it on a previous phone"

From my experience this is completely false. I just switched from Galaxy S8 to S20, and I transferred everything and had the new phone setup exactly like the old one, with all apps (that would allow it, LINE wouldn't) and even ringtones and text tones set how I had them in about 20 minutes.


What's wrong with short selling? The only reason why people like Elon Musk don't like short selling is because they know that their companies are massively overvalued.


The problem is profiting from spreading misinformation. Tesla short-sellers run large operations that fabricate and spread lies. It's usually easier to spread misinformation than to debunk it.


And Tesla will happily release misinformation too.

One of the last fatalities, Tesla was more than happy to push out a press release based on telemetry, saying "Autopilot wasn't at fault, the driver was inattentive - the vehicle even told him to put his hands on the steering wheel!".

They somehow neglected to mention that the steering wheel alert was triggered, ONCE, and FOURTEEN MINUTES before the crash.

Misinformation is not a good thing. But lets not pretend that Tesla is some downtrodden underdog just trying to make our lives better.

Also, if you have an accident in your Tesla, you'll have a lot of fun trying to get any telemetry information from them, even if Tesla isn't a named party and you're just dealing with the other involved person. You'll need multiple subpoenas and expect them to resist releasing any data as "proprietary".

But should your telemetry from an accident be able to be spun (correctly or otherwise) into a Get out of Jail Free card for Tesla, expect it to be released to the media without your consent or authorization (I'm sure it's buried in Section 48, Subsection 24, Paragraph 14c iii that you consent, but still).


And the companies don't spread misinformation? Not saying it's right in either case but companies, Tesla included aren't shining beacons of morality and truthfulness.


It's not in their interest to lie in the long term. Those companies who lie are scams and they're spotted pretty quickly (e.g. Theranos, Nikola). Elon has made some mishaps, such as 'funding secured @420' tweet, which he was punished for. Public companies have to be pretty careful in their communications. Making promises with too optimistic schedules is not lying, it's just an error in forecasting, and is common in technology.


That couldn't be further from the truth. Theranos survived for 15 years. Wirecard 22 years. Enron 10+ years. Fraud gives you a massive competitive advantage.

Not too along ago I thought of Musk as a misunderstood genius, now I'm pretty certain he knows exactly what he is doing (for the most part). If you look at all the oddities surrounding Tesla, there are clear patterns emerging.

Plainsite has a good summary [1].

[1] https://www.plainsite.org/realitycheck/tsla.pdf


That report is a bunch of horseshit. Lot of words without any substance. He even cherry-picked some data to "prove" that Tesla's sales are declining. Everyone can see the actual progress that Tesla and SpaceX has made. Their cars are winning awards and they're innovating and building new factories as fast as they can. Who cares if they miss a couple of estimates. SpaceX can deliver payload to orbit with much lower cost than competitors.

True though that those companies survived for too long.


I don't know what world you've experienced, but lying in business is incredibly common. I've seen it personally, and there are plenty of cases of Tobacco companies, DOW, Alcohol companies, and many many more knowingly lying.

Of course they do, it's in their best interest to lie. To think that companies will only tell the truth "because it's in their best interest" is childish, and not at all historically accurate.


"Either way, singling out mobile games like the text in Godot's documentation did is a mistake."

You're right, console and desktop games that do that are also a problem.


That isn't a clear cut answer to the game being played, they can play it and not be happy with some of the games practices, we really don't know unless a study is done.

Anecdotally All of my friends who play games hate microtransactions and loot boxes. Some don't care if it's only cosmetic though.


Just because something was done historically doesn't make it right or correct.


I agree, and we're starting to get heavily in to epistemology here, but modern sciences do not have the ability to construct properly controlled studies, and "harder" sciences do not have enough understanding of the underlying biology to provide a definitive answer.

At best we can get a "we think it's like this", but I'm not sure I give that a higher epistemic status than tens of thousands of years of human history. This is probably a pointless discussion, since there is not enough information to reach a conclusion.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: