Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kytazo's commentslogin

Why was this flagged?


I didn't flag it, but possibly because it pretends that Joe Rogan doesn't count as "mainstream media" despite being extremely mainstream, or alternatively because it pretends that "mainstream media" is somehow inherently untrustworthy in a way that Joe Rogan is immune to despite his acknowledged detachment from reality.


New medias grow and become mainstream yes. You have to interpret each word in when they happened chronologically…


The false narrative that there's a 'mainstream media' which is lies and propaganda, as compared to plucky unafraid truth-telling upstarts like Fox and Sinclair and Joe Rogan.


Impressive! Glad to be able to use Revolut again. Wondering, is this a change or their end or some workaround implemented by Graphene?


My impression would be the opposite. IPv6s get constantly rotated by most ISPs.

MACs are always randomized, even when connecting to the same network. At least as far as modern devices go.

Am I wrong?


> IPv6s get constantly rotated by most ISPs

I've had the same prefix for five years now.

And yeah, sure, my device cycles through ephemeral IPv6 addresses often, but always within the same prefix.

Group IPs somewhere between /64s and /56 and you'll essentially get a household identity, at least for a few days to a few years.


Yep. The addresses in an IPv6 /56 or so are about the same as an IPv4 address as far as identifying a single location.


IPv6 isn't the boogeyman for tracking in general, because so much still relies on IPv4


Last I heard, the default on Android was to randomize MAC address across networks but keep them static for each network.


It's actually well documented. What you're describing is the default (mostly), but it's more complicated than that.

Proper randomization can be enabled through the developer settings.

https://source.android.com/docs/core/connect/wifi-mac-random...


You don't trust the devs, you trust the public code


Unless you build it yourself you do trust the devs. You aren't running public code on your phone you're running compiled binaries. Compiled by who? How securely? Who has keys?

It's also a leap of faith to assume that public code is any safer.


You're not wrong that one needs to have some trust in the devs of open source code, but if you are this level of paranoid then having the code available is essential to your threat model because it allows you to build it yourself so you know what you're running. Nobody can audit everything, but if enough people are involved in the development, they would all have to collude (or the malicious one has to hope they get lucky) since each one of them has a chance to spot when one of the developers were to be malicious


Well, the prior lead dev of the project did have some very strong personality quirks and odd behavior in conflicts with a lot of people. So much so that he was encouraged to leave the project and did so.

That incident and a few prior ones of his had me remove GrapheneOS from my phone. There's clearly a new lead contributor to the project from the git repo, but the leadership of the project is completely opaque and thus not something that I want to run on my phone.

I just fixed my habits so that I don't really do anything much with my phone. I mostly receive calls and text and do OTP. I use Aegis for that and back that up in the cloud. I wipe my phone basically monthly and I'm back up and running with all my apps/contacts/configs inside of 5 minutes.


My point is if I don't trust Google why should I trust anons and anime characters more?

I was hoping someone could give me more than "it's public."


Sorry, it is what it is


Graphene builds are verifiable, go build them yourself if you feel like.

Public code is definitely safer than binary blobs.


> Customize to your heart’s content

Ok Sir https://ibb.co/fGx3Qf55


Wait until you see AI


Yes they forgot that while trying to make a statement or something


Just happened to notice how the author contradicts himself by stating "I love to distro hop" but later in the article "I don't just like to distro hop".

A good article nonetheless.


Hey, I've been wanting to do something similar for some time now for my domestic audience.

Putting it all together is quite an effort, are you satisfied on the returns considering the time/effort you've put into it?


I would assume people using Linux more or less care to an extend


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: