When I worked at a company with a gym, people would finesse their workout into their working day, so they weren't spending additional time in their day working out. That's the perk imo, the time savings and convenience, not saving on a gym membership.
Part of the perk is also avoiding the question "is it worth it for me?". There's way less friction when something is free, even when compared with a somewhat negligible price.
The dataset Z is a collection of facts. The output Y captures the patterns from Z. The LLM can generate novel insights (facts) that satisfy Y without violating the data processing inequality if we consider the patterns to be a part of the information of Z.
If I understand you correctly, you basically mean some interpolation of knowledge within Z, that was not known to humans before, but can be synthesized by recombination of information within Z.
Yet, that still means, knowledge of O cannot be synthesized.
I don't think this would be a factor. Some PCI-E 4.0 SSDs already come with metal heatsinks out of the box. If future SSDs needs addtitional cooling, this will be communicated to the buyer.
I think that the bigger question is whether 25W can be phisically supplied to the drives by contemporary motherboards. What is the power limit for the m.2 ports?
“By selecting this license I give anyone permission to do X, Y, and Z with my software - provided they do A as well.”
“I’m going to chose to do Z and A with your software.”
“Moral hazard! Moral hazard!”
Picking a license indicates what you are willing to have others do with your work. If you don’t want people to be able to monetize it, pick a different license.
> Picking a license indicates what you are willing to have others do with your work.
Picking a license indicates what you are willing to have others do with your work without going after them with a threat of handcuffs and prison bars. I might not be willing to do or threaten (government-mediated) violence to someone for being an arsehole, and yet consider them an arsehole.
This seems pretty silly. It's a civil matter, isn't it? Has anyone ever gone to jail for violating an open source license?
You could simply choose to not pursue legal action against license violators. Choosing a permissive license and then complaining when people do what you gave them permission to do is just ridiculous.
External impression, not facts, but intuition seeing how some VCs and startups are acting:
He didn't seem to have a real choice, maybe an illusion of choice since (from an external point of view) as he was pinned against the wall.
They were using his software commercially and even using the trademark of Salvatore (he was complaining about such uses occasionally). He was broke, I guess that's why he didn't register the trademark.
Literally while they raised 40M USD, he was explaining struggling on this board:
If Salvatore just got 10% of the company he would get 100M+ USD.
1%: 10M+ USD.
Something must have happened.
If I'm wrong and he is super rich, then it's my mistake, but in general it's incredibly easy to get screwed up in a hostile shareholding / corporate environment when in front of you you have experienced lawyers and bankers.
