> There is another possibility - you're lazy and selfish, so you don't care how your interruptions affect others because your questions need to be answered right now with minimal effort on your end. But I'm sure that's not the case.
> So, when I answer your "Quick call?" with "What's the problem?", that's really for your own good :wink face:
Please do not ever write sentences like this in a professional context where you are not friends with the recipients, it's terrible.
It sets the tone to "adult to children discussion where I think that I am smarter than you" which is the last thing you want when you try to solve on of your pain point.
One the other hand if you want me to avoid interacting with you as much as I can that would be spot on.
I also have one to kill all running javascript and remove all event listeners, it works wonders when you are redirected to a paywall / login page after a few seconds.
What if the owner has a different opinion than you of what is offending and what is not?
They get to remove sites you think are good and keep sites you think are bad.
In the end, the only fair and objective way to filter content is the rule of law, as it applies to everyone equally. Every subjective decision will always offend some people.
I personally think the linked page "the long game" [1] found in this page is more interesting on this topic than the original link.
> What if the owner has a different opinion than you of what is offending and what is not? They get to remove sites you think are good and keep sites you think are bad.
Yup.
> In the end, the only fair and objective way to filter content is the rule of law, as it applies to everyone equally
While it is ideal for the rule of law to be fair and apply to everyone equally, it never actually achieves that idea. The only fair way to govern what content people are compelled to relay is to let people choose what content to relay.
> Every subjective decision will always offend some people.
All decisions, including the decisions to incorporate particular standards are subjective.
> While it is ideal for the rule of law to be fair and apply to everyone equally, it never actually achieves that idea. The only fair way to govern what content people are compelled to relay is to let people choose what content to relay.
There is an alternative that is equally fair: don't let people choose what content to relay.
This also has the benefit of weakening the impact of relayers on the conversation.
I think it's possible in professional edition but you have to be offline on home edition. (I messed up and installed pro for a home key, so I did it back to back with same ISO)
I reinstalled a computer about a month ago, same thing but I didn't have to mess with BIOS settings, going back 2 steps and disconnecting the wifi worked.
If you have Bitwarden in Firefox's toolbar the icon will also display a number indicating the number of available credentials, and clicking the icon to open it and then clicking any of the entries autofills.
> Every change causes people to question why they use the site in the first place.
I was using twitter to follow very few, high quality feeds, and with this new update it was made clear that the intended usage is the opposite. No more twitter for me, I'm back to good old RSS feeds.
Beside that, I can't believe anyone would find the new design better than the old one on a monitor, the menu has more presence than the actual tweets.
The Twitter redesign (last week or so?) has been wonderful for me: it keeps your place in navigation, allowing you to look at a tweet thread and go back to the place you were before.
Previously on Twitter, after any navigation you'd lose your place, having to scroll (and reload all the previously-seen content) very far if you were down far.
On the other hand, every time I have been back since the changeover, they reset my feed to 'algorithmically chosen tweets' (or whatever they call it) instead of the "by time posted" option I invariably want and choose. It's gotten so I'm pretty unlikely to go back to Twitter now, since along with this major annoyance, it's ugly, cluttered to the point of near unusable, and all-round annoying to me. So long and thanks for all the tweety birds, I guess.
Because they want to control what people see in their feeds to prolong eyeball seconds, which you get by hiding what you find interesting in piles of poo.
> So, when I answer your "Quick call?" with "What's the problem?", that's really for your own good :wink face:
Please do not ever write sentences like this in a professional context where you are not friends with the recipients, it's terrible.
It sets the tone to "adult to children discussion where I think that I am smarter than you" which is the last thing you want when you try to solve on of your pain point.
One the other hand if you want me to avoid interacting with you as much as I can that would be spot on.