Configurable randomness. A particular beat has probabilities of containing eighth notes, triplets, or sixteenth notes based on the "Rhythmic Variety" setting, and those notes have a probability of being rests based on the "Rests" setting.
Totally original. I came up with it by looking at lots of examples and seeing patterns emerge. It's not perfect, but it turns out that checking a select few indicators is sufficient in the vast majority of cases.
This is pretty accurate. tl;dr: What I did wasn't great but it could have been a lot worse (see all the things I made it a point of not doing), and that gives you something to think about when it comes to data and privacy.
Wow, that's a pretty unimpressive response. It's bad enough you did it, but I seriously doubt you realize how wrong what you have done really is when you discount that wrong doing so easily.
To make it clear: You advertised an anonymous service to a community you're a direct member of and didn't disclose your involvement in it. You not only willingly broke a moral code that you knew about, but you actually misrepresented the service in your advertisement and broke any trust you had with everyone who participated. That's a pretty serious wrong doing that warrants a little more self reflection and much more empathy towards the people you screwed over.
