It is the former. The latter is not necessary: lots of those of us with ASD don't need anything close to an idetic memory to hold insane amounts of minutiae about some random topic or other if it happens to be the topic we're deeply interested in
What do you make of Erik Wemple's investigation of the incident, which he describes at https://twitter.com/ErikWemple/status/1763646613778563225? He is a media critic at the Washington Post -- is he lying about his incident, too?
That's not quite right. If the study is underpowered at n = 50 --- which is extremely likely --- statistically significant estimates are likely to be inflated. And as power declines, they also become more likely to have the wrong sign (e.g., the study will yield a positive estimate even though the true effect is negative).
In general, that link does have more information. But if one wants to learn about how individual blocks or areas are zoned, the OP's site (https://secondcityzoning.org) is much easier to use and seems to offer more information, too.
Party affiliation for the Fence Viewer is not listed on our town's report. At least here, it's an appointed position. I have no idea if this is true everywhere though.
I haven't lived here long enough to know if the Fence Viewer being called upon to resolve some dispute.
It's both. Source: I follow him on Twitter, and I'm a professor of American politics.