Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ivv's comments login

Spending more time outdoors makes it less likely the child will end up needing glasses. Learned that one too late.

Also, people carry their childhood experiences with them for the rest of their lives, and these experiences are shaping a lot of their adult behaviors. It’s sobering to think that we as parents are responsible not only for a slice of someone’s life but for its entire trajectory.


> It’s sobering to think that we as parents are responsible not only for a slice of someone’s life but for its entire trajectory.

I don't agree (but I'm not sober!). Your kids will make their own lives, and their own mistakes. Once they're past 12, there's not a lot you can do to shape that trajectory.

My kids were stroppy and rebellious. One became a sort of underground environmentalist, the other became a rather conservative schoolmarm (which to me was a rebellion). They chose to be rebellious; I wasn't responsible for that (except possibly through genetics). At the time, I'd have preferred for them to be compliant, because it would have been more convenient. Now, of course, I'm glad that both my kids turned out to be assertive, confident adults that think for themselves.

Oh yes - kids turn into adults in about 15 years. By the time they're 20, they've either gone or they want to go. Raising kids will only ever be a small part of your life. Even if you find it hard, it's not a life-sentence.


Little Caesar was a co-founder’s nickname.


Logitech has (or had) a Skype camera that you’d clip to a TV to do a similar thing; it’s been around for years.


Maybe residents would place beacons where they want the drones to land?


Indeed, the beacon is a landing pad that customers place in their front or backyards (ideally back). See (3) in the following link:

https://www.digitalspy.com/tech/a820748/amazon-prime-air-dro...

As for which house, that's via geocoding (convert postal code to GPS). Reasonably accurate for North America, unclear about other parts of the world.


Since WSJ didn't bother to link to the study, its title is "Online Tracking and Publishers’ Revenues: An Empirical Analysis," you can see it on Google's Scholar.

It's not about whether the cookie is "enabled", but whether the cookie for a particular impression is available for matching.

The experiment looked at ad transactions of a single media company.


Probably child care / private schooling for the two children. Don't see it itemized in the table.


I'd select 10 random users who abandoned the app and offered them $10 in Amazon ecards for 10 minutes on the phone with me. Then, I'd ask them what they had hoped for when they signed up, and what went wrong.


I think it would help to provide a questionaire form instead. People really really really don't like talking to strangers on the phone.


Speak for yourself. I would prefer a human interaction over a list of questions. Also you'd have more of a chance to get elaboration on things you find interesting.


It depends on the audience the app is targeted at. If it's a geeky thing, phone calls might not work.


Exactly this. 80% churn means you don’t have an app (yet.) or, you have an app, but you are not positioning it correctly. You have the wrong customers basically.


Romanian


The "mail-merge" the article refers to is also known as "spinning". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_spinning


When talking to startups as their prospective client, I feel I can often tell which ones are from a Y-combinator batch; they are nice, responsive, and thoughtful.


I had a phone screen with a YC company this week and left with the opposite conclusion.


What type of thing puts you in position to be a client of many startups?


I work in one of the data-related verticals that has a fair number of startups selling to companies like ours.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: