I couldn't agree more,
"""In other words, I believe there are blind spots because Flutter team members don't actually use Flutter."""
Electron creators made atom, the best text editor, and then vscode,
And flutter doesn't have a signature app to show that it can be used for serious purposes.
Currently, the most famous open source app in the community is appflow.io, I compare the current state of appflow.io to the current state of flutter, even the unfixable bugs.
I compare vscode to the JavaScript ecosystem, with both advantages and disadvantages,
From a quick look at the gitlab I don't see any mention of similar requirements. If that's the case, it would be easier to run. Also bonus if gpu support is better than "NVIDIA GPUs do not work currently"
But I thought the experience with waydroid is running an android system in a window? You can run android applications directly in Linux as their own "native" window using waydroid?
Yes, you can have Android apps showing up in Gnome (e.g., likely all DEs) menu and open them directly in their own window without seeing the waydroid launcher.
But you can’t get more clicks. You have to attack enough people to get clicks.I feel like this place is becoming more and more filled with posts and titles like this.
And someone else can take up the mantle. But perhaps, just perhaps, a business can just exist and turn a modest profit, without trying to scorch the earth raising revenue infinitely.
The split of ATT killed Unix2, so we spent 30 years re-implementing Linux+k8s. These things that existed in Unix2 & Plan9 were re-implemented by Plan9 employees in Google Labs.
UNIX exists because ATT was split. They could not profit from software (by law because of an agreement with the government) so early versions of UNIX where made free.
i can't even understand what you are saying? AT&T was good, or bad?
AT&T copyrights led to linux, and linux, independent of unix, has been a huge boon for good, and for unixness.
the threat to unix now is all the people who by nature prefer Dave Cutlerness, and can't see that their way is the wrong way, now they are using linux (because it won) and trying to ruin it.
The AT&T split had nothing to do with monopoly regulation (as opposed to the Bell breakup in 1982), other than the fact that Wall Street wasn't rewarding regulated operating companies with dot-com valuations. AT&T wanted to sell hardware to other telcos and dot-coms, so spun off Lucent, which had no idea what it wanted to do with P9/Inferno (which was a fantastic piece of kit!) other than embed it into a couple of network products. Lucent bet heavily on unstable CLECs like Worldcom, generated a couple of headline-creating network crashes, and then failed to capitalize on their pole position in optical long-haul (to be fair, they also bet heavily on a very unstable Global Crossing for that). There's a lot of mismanagement and failures that can be ascribed to Lucent leadership without government or regulatory intervention being involved.
My mental model was that Apple provides backdoor decryption keys to China in advance for devices sold in China/Chinese iCloud accounts, but that they cannot/will not bypass device encryption for China for devices sold outside of the country/foreign iCloud accounts.