Does it just start a search or does the chat continue with the results? Would be cool to continue the chat with result, which were filtered acording to the blacklist.
The chat continues with the results, and I often explicitly tell it "search to make sure your answer is correct" if I see it making stuff up without actually searching. I use it multiple times a day for all sorts of things.
Sound very stressful. I hope you and your family are doing well. I had problems with asthma in kindergarten and it is very scary for the first few times, after that I at least knew the drill and that I wouldn't die.
My code can (optionally, since it is often not useful) dither all the way down to the physical pixels of your display device for that really crisp, old-fashioned look. Most dithering projects on the web don't take this into account so look slightly soft around the edges of the pixels.
The image at the bottom is an example. On some devices this interacts weirdly with the pattern of pixels or even the refresh rate when in motion due to scrolling.
I don't golf and I also don't watch golf, but banning of Aimpoint doesn't seem to make any sense.
It isn't any crazy technology, which gives a player an unfair advantage. It's just feeling the green and holding a hand up.
The number one reason to ban it is that golf is a spectator sport and nobody likes watching aimpoint. It is also slow, and poor pace of play can make golf less fun to watch as well.
Pro Golf is under some pressure to become more exciting to watch and faster paced. PGA Tour isn’t the only game in town- there is LIV, TGL, and YouTube golf competing.
I think we are going to see some measures in pro golf taken purely for the sake of the viewer. The pitch clock in baseball was a successful move with similar motivation
How much can aimpoint improve sub-pro level golfers? If it's just a little there's a risk that the pro stuff may seem dull, just people playing under even more arbitrary constraints than you do.
But if they're still leaps and bounds ahead it can still be fun watching people of a skill you understand enough to be amazed.
I'm a 20 handicap who bought AimPoint five or six years ago and it improved my green reading immensely. And I certainly do not waste playing partner's time on the green. It's just a quick feel, stick up the fingers and then putt.
The biggest issue with pro golf is how it’s produced. As for slow play that’s not AimPoint specific. You can play at a reasonable pace and use it. The Tour just needs to enforce pace.
It sounds difficult to make a definitive statement based on the findings of the referenced paper:
"Overall, the vitamin content of the frozen commodities was comparable to and occasionally higher than that of their fresh counterparts. β-Carotene, however, was found to decrease drastically in some commodities."
Yes, citation needed (and also probably unlikely to be forthcoming or validated) but the rest of the comment stands, so let's just ignore this weakest/most-dubious claim.
If you don't share the task description or other materials provided by your university, I don't see the problem with sharing your essay. (Not a lawyer)
It's a sure fire way to get your uni submission incorrectly flagged as plagiarism. How straightforward it is to prove you're the original author varies by institution.
once the essay is already graded, it should not matter. and less as time passes.
on the contrary i thought any essay, paper or report written for uni or school can be considered for publication in some form. not everything is worth publishing of course, but if it is, talk to your supervisors about it.
The video team has a wiki [1] and the NOC a few photos on mastodon [2]. There used to be at least one more detailed report but FFS Google is useless these days.
