Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more harryjo's comments login

http://www.gettingsmart.com/2011/03/jordan-lloyd-bookey-k-12...

Examples of Google’s programs include:

● Google’s Computing and Programming Experience (CAPE): This four-week experience is for 8th graders to gain exposure to CS. This summer we will have around 130 students, and we hope to further expand this content to organizations and schools around the country. We are looking to test this new model with MS2 in Washington, DC this summer.

● LEAD Program for Computer Science: This is a rigorous and exciting summer residential program for underrepresented minority students in grades 9-11, held at four universities in its upcoming inaugural year..

● Trailblazer Award: This is an award (in Europe) that is given internationally for participation in national science fairs. Winners are all treated to a 2-day Trailblazer retreat with fellow winners to learn more about the possibilities of a career in CS.

● Counselors for Computing: This program trains counselors to teach their fellow guidance counselors the benefits of CS degrees. Through our partner members at NCWIT, we are hoping to scale impact through these critical influencers.

● CS4HS is an initiative sponsored by Google to promote CS and Computational Thinking in high school and middle school curriculum by hosting CS teachers at campuses worldwide to learn about leading edge practice in the field.

● Computer Science Teachers Association: We are an ongoing supporter of the CSTA and, in particular, recently hosted their CS&IT symposium for 200 CS teachers at our Mountain View campus.


Google is doing that (not exactly for HBCUs, but for underrepresented subpopulations) https://www.google.com/about/careers/students/engres.html


Which is why having additional instruction and additional acclimation to the Silicon Valley environment, which Google and Howard are doing here, is so important - to creating a culture where diverse engineers can thrive.


"Two body problem" refers to a married couple. It is p^2 as hard to find good jobs near a potential home.


If NYC was such a bad idea, why is it a massive portion of the US economy?


It's not a bad idea. There's just a few hundred million of us that don't want to live there/that way. I'm happy for everyone that does want to be there.


I didn't say it was a bad idea.

But... a significant percentage of professional jobs are in the NY Metro area, but not in the movie ideal NYC environment.


Small city has 0 or 1 employers that are larger than local in scope. It's fine if you are an accountant or dentist or carpenter and there aren't too many like you in town already, but what if you work in a specialized industry?


Consider Melbourne, FL. It's in that size range.

It has Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Harris, Embraer, GE Transportation Systems, GE Energy Management, FightLite Industries, Thales, Raytheon, DRS, and a bunch of little cyberwar startups.

So there is plenty related to aircraft, cyberwar, and generally all sorts of engineering/manufacturing/etc. for government (especially military) purposes.

Working in a specialized industry is fine. The city is specialized.

OTOH, moving elsewhere is not the end of the world. There are many other fine small cities all across America. You don't have to live where there is more than one job suited for you. Moving every now and then will let you experience more of America.


Financial Times has nearly no ads.


Why is a full feed of quality news worth less to you than Netflix?


Netflix provides many times more hours of entertainment than the WSJ could ever hope to.


If you consider news only an entertainment product, that's a fair comparison. If you want to know what's going on in the world, it's not.


Netflix costs too much for what it is. News that you can find anywhere else is certainly not worth much. Yes, depending upon how you wish it to be documented and such, it may be worth it but I don't understand the want to see any more news than the local news and what Google can provide. I'm not against supporting; I just wonder why anyone would spend more than an hour a day reading news from one source.


"quality news" is rarely consistent or reliable.

wsj in particular had some rather absurd hit pieces on bernie sanders.


Netflix is $9 a month here in Australia.


Nobody pays for Netflix; they just use their cousin's/sister's/girlfriend's/etc.'s account.


Is section 3.1 "20%" time still true?


In my experience, yes. Most people find it courteous to inform their manager but I did a lot of 20% time that led to getting hired with Google Brain, and it was never any doubt in my mind that my manager would approve.

That being said, there were times when I was really excited about the project so I would work 80% time plus 40% time and stay late.


Can you tell us about what exactly you did that led you to getting hired with GB?


I don't want to get too specific but I did a 20% project that led to a couple of conference abstracts with one subteam. This built relationships which helped when I applied internally to work on a different subteam.

20% time aiding in team transfer is very common I think.


You guys seem to think that Google is benevolent by giving engineers that 20%, while in fact they do that for very selfish reasons: it is all about copyrights.

They hire the smartest Software Engineers in the world, so it is only a matter of time that some of them will create new, disruptive product.

If they weren't given that 20% of time at Google they would do that anyway, on weekends, but since they do it in company-sponsored time then Google owns the copyrights to all of their work.


Companies own your work even if you do it off the clock, in many cases.


That's not the case in most states, like California, New York and Massachusetts, due to state laws.


What new York state law prohibits this? My contract says that as a salaried employee I work at the company for 23:59 hours Monday to saturday, so it's only Sunday that's off the clock.

And from what I understood, all inventions they own, but I am still very iffy on what's qualified as an invention.

A coworker even asked for bosses blessing to sell some stuff on the side unrelated to the company, he said no because as per the contract that wouldn't let coworker give full undivided attention to the company.


California excludes IP that:

> Relate at the time of conception or reduction to practice of the invention to the employer’s business, or actual or demonstrably anticipated research or development of the employer

For google, that's pretty much all software related projects.


This is not the case in most countries in the world.

Given that you work on your own time and don't use company's resources.


> You guys seem to think that Google is benevolent by giving engineers that 20%, while in fact they do that for very selfish reasons: it is all about copyrights.

What did he say that makes you think that?


It is for me.


> would/should

There are billions of dollars of difference between "would" and "should"

Who is "they" who act like it's super-awesome?


Then you have to run a tool that processes .go source files in order to perform dependency analysis. Consistency is a virtue.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: