Basically generates links of Google queries to find each job in the company's own website. That helps me find the most recent, unpublished related and non-walled.
Job boards are filled with old posts they repost for the looks, and that makes about 20% or less of the actual job market. After contacting companies I've even got way more recent offers from their HR, that they might not publish, meaning what's published online could be 50% of the actual job market, with lots of timed offers.
So I ask the script to throw a few random and play the job lottery :D
I didn't like the blinking at first, so I made it pulse instead (smoother) but was never to the point of headaches. that said, sound should work if you can keep a headset ; )
I am not asking why some people might not be able to take a cold shower (which is different than just being "unhealthy"), I am asking why the studies are "fundamentally flawed" because of that. Like obviously the studies can't include those people, but does that somehow negate the results for the people that do participate? It seems like any given study would have some % of people who cannot participate.
In the documentary about Wim Hof (by Vice think), he was friends with a guy with terminal cancer who said doing the cold plunges made the cancer bearable and changed his life.
I mean he wasn’t claiming it cured him. He was just some philosophy professor who was suffering existential terror as one does at the end of life. And he said that doing cold plunges helped him, an avowed atheist, face death’s door with courage. I feel like that’s something that should at least give us pause, similar to how psilocybin seems to have a similar effect.
Starfield companions would've frown upon this solution.
More seriously though: 10 years is a long time, this is super interesting but one would wonder if in such time other limiting dengue factors might've arose.
I'm pretty sure this would be their preferred solution. They all get angry at you (and chastise you for not "trusting the science" because in the 23rd century, ecology is not considered science anymore?) for wanting to reintroduce the predator instead of spreading a microbe.
Very cringy.
I am sure there are a lot good things Apple is doing on the matter, but that segment was super cringe-worthy in its delivery.
And needlessly long.
edit: I don't mind the loud virtue signaling, I just think its delivery was incredibly bad. Opinion.
Aside from the suggestions, sometimes having a third-party processor "visible" is kind of helpful in case your website is not super well-known, because it gives "trustworthiness".
I know it's 2023, but yeah, mistrust in online transactions is still alive.
Agreed. If I'm buying from a site and see that they're trying to roll their own checkout and payment processor I'm very, very wary and will, at best, use a disposable card number.